Stimulus-response links and the backward crosstalk effect — A comparison of forced- and free-choice tasks
| Autor: | Markus Janczyk, Christoph Naefgen, André F. Caissie |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Two-alternative forced choice 05 social sciences Experimental and Cognitive Psychology General Medicine Neuropsychological Tests Stimulus (physiology) Choice Behavior 050105 experimental psychology Stimulus response Conflict Psychological Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Reaction Time Developmental and Educational Psychology Humans Female 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Psychology Social psychology Psychomotor Performance 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Cognitive psychology |
| Zdroj: | Acta Psychologica. 177:23-29 |
| ISSN: | 0001-6918 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.010 |
| Popis: | In dual-tasks, characteristics of Task 2 responses can already affect performance in the preceding Task 1. This is called the backward crosstalk effect (BCE). To account for the BCE, it has been suggested that the appearance of the Task 2 stimulus automatically projects activation onto the corresponding response through (transient or direct) stimulus-response (S-R) links. One way to investigate this claim is to compare the size of the BCE for tasks where S-R links are differently strong. To this end, we here compared BCEs for forced- vs. free-choice tasks, with the S-R links assumed to be stronger in the former than in the latter task. In Experiments 1 and 2, Task 1 was either forced-choice or free-choice and Task 2 always forced-choice, and in Experiment 3 this order was reversed. A BCE was observed in all experiments with the forced-choice tasks, but in response times it was smaller in Experiments 1 and 2 and absent in Experiment 3 with the free-choice task. However, in free-choice Task 1 responses, a bias towards selecting the response required in Task 2 was observed. These results suggest that the strength of S-R links plays a role in determining the size of the BCE. Relations to other studies and alternative explanations are discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect