Comparing the ability of OPTION12 and OPTION5 to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling
| Autor: | Ashley V. Port-Thompson, Patricia Birch, Jan M. Friedman, Shelin Adam, Stuart W. Grande, Martina A. Vortel |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Psychometrics Genetic counseling Decision Making Concurrent validity Genetic Counseling Context (language use) Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Patient-Centered Care Surveys and Questionnaires Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Patient participation Reliability (statistics) Observer Variation Physician-Patient Relations business.industry Communication 030503 health policy & services Reproducibility of Results Patient Preference Usability General Medicine Scale (social sciences) Female Patient Participation 0305 other medical science Psychology business Social psychology Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Patient Education and Counseling. 99:1717-1723 |
| ISSN: | 0738-3991 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.024 |
| Popis: | Objectives OPTION12 is the most widely used tool to measure shared decision-making (SDM) in health care. A newer scale, OPTION5, has been proposed as a more parsimonious measure that better addresses core concepts of SDM. This study compares OPTION5 to OPTION12 in prenatal genetic counselling. Methods Two raters independently used OPTION12 and OPTION5 to score 27 clinical encounters between genetic counsellors (GC) and women with pregnancies at increased risk for genetic conditions. Global and item scores on the two instruments were compared to test concurrent validity and to identify usability in this context. Inter-rater reliability was also assessed for both instruments. Results Mean scores for OPTION12 were 43.8 (SD = 9.7), and for OPTION5 were = 60.6 (SD = 12.5). The correlation between OPTION12 and OPTION5 scores was r = 0.70. Inter-rater reliability was 0.70 and 0.85 for OPTION12 and OPTION5 respectively, however mean inter-rater reliability for individual items was 0.31 and 0.63 for OPTION12 and OPTION5 respectively. Conclusions GCs exhibit SDM as measured by both OPTION instruments. OPTION5 exhibits improved psychometric performance relative to OPTION12, and more specifically targets the core constructs of SDM. However, refinement of OPTION instruments or manuals is needed to improve reliability and validity in GC assessment. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect