A defense of surgical procedures regulation

Autor: Mattia Andreoletti, Federico Bina
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 43 (2)
ISSN: 1573-1200
1386-7415
DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000548441
Popis: Since the advent of drug regulation in 1962, regulatory agencies have been in the practice of using strict standards to test the safety and efficacy of medical treatments and products. Regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, demand two full-fledged Randomized Clinical Trials demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of drugs to grant its marketing authorization. On the contrary, surgical treatments are left completely unregulated. There are several reasons explaining this difference, and all of them point to the difficulty of conducting well-designed RCTs in surgery. However, we argue that none of these arguments is decisive and that, under certain conditions, surgical RCTs can be morally justified and methodologically sound. Although ethical constraints restrict the number of testable surgical procedures, and surgical trials might not be as dependable as pharmaceutical RCTs, our analysis suggests that, in certain cases, it is possible to obtain high-quality evidence about the safety and efficacy of surgical procedures. Untested surgical treatments may prove to be ineffective and harm patients. Therefore, regulation of surgical procedures seems not only morally acceptable and able to provide reliable scientific evidence, but also desirable and justified from an ethical-political standpoint.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 43 (2)
ISSN:1573-1200
ISSN:1386-7415
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: