The effect of different aging protocols on the flexural strength and phase transformations of two monolithic zirconia ceramics
| Autor: | Nikolaos Kantiranis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Triantafyllia T. Zorba, Maria Kelesi, Konstantinos M. Paraskevopoulos, Petros Koidis, Lambrini Papadopoulou |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Ceramics
Materials science Surface Properties lcsh:Biotechnology Biomedical Engineering Biophysics Bioengineering 02 engineering and technology Temperature cycling Biomaterials 03 medical and health sciences Dental Materials 0302 clinical medicine Flexural strength Phase (matter) lcsh:TP248.13-248.65 Flexural Strength Materials Testing Cubic zirconia Yttrium Ceramic Composite material Monolithic zirconia 030206 dentistry General Medicine 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology visual_art visual_art.visual_art_medium Stress Mechanical Zirconium 0210 nano-technology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, Vol 18 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 2280-8000 |
| Popis: | Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate how different aging protocols can affect the flexural strength and phase transformations of yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramics (Y-TZP) for monolithic restorations. Materials and methods: Bar-shaped specimens from two zirconia ceramics bars were divided into three groups: a. no treatment (c), b. aging in an autoclave (a), and c. thermal cycling (t). The flexural strength was determined by the 3-point bending test and statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences ( p< 0.05). Weibull statistics was used to analyze the dispersion of strength values while surface microstructural analysis was performed through X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Aging did not significantly affect the flexural strength but differences were recorded between the two groups, with group A presenting higher strength values and m-phase percentages. Conclusions: The observed differences between the two ceramics could be attributed to variations in composition and processing. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|