Implant loss and crestal bone loss in early loading versus delayed and immediate loading in edentulous mandibles. A systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Javier Flores-Fraile, José-Luis Pardal-Refoyo, Beatriz Pardal-Peláez, Javier Montero |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Prosthetic Dentistry
Crestal bone business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Dentistry Review 030206 dentistry law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Immediate loading Meta-analysis Early loading medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Implant business Dental implant General Dentistry UNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Dental alveolus |
| Zdroj: | Pardal-Peláez, B., Flores-Fraile, J., Pardal-Refoyo, J. L., & Montero, J. (2021). Implant loss and crestal bone loss in early loading versus delayed and immediate loading in edentulous mandibles. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 13(4), e397–e405. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry |
| ISSN: | 1989-5488 |
| DOI: | 10.4317/jced.57966 |
| Popis: | Background Information about the risk of early loss and crestal bone loss of dental implants which have been loaded early is scant if compared with data available for those conventionally or immediately loaded. A meta-analysis of early loss and crestal bone loss in immediate or delayed loaded full mandibular denture retaining dental implants has been recently published. It is interesting to evaluate also the risks of early versus immediate and delayed loading in complete mandibular restorations. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study early (EL) versus immediate (IL) and delayed loading (DL) protocols in edentulous mandibles to determine whether differences exist in implant success and crestal bone loss. Material and methods The literature review was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Seven randomized clinical trials were included. Results The result of a meta-analysis of implant loss before 1 year in EL versus IL was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.08, 1.52), favoring the EL control group, while the outcome for crestal bone loss at the three-year observation was -0.10 (95% CI: -0.28, 0.09), with a tendency toward reduced bone loss for EL. In the EL versus DL group, the result of the meta-analysis of implant loss before one year was inconclusive, while in the comparison regarding crestal bone loss in the first year of observation, the result was -0.03 (95% CI: -0.08,-0.02) with a tendency to less bone loss in EL. Conclusions The risk of early implant loss in the IL group was higher than in the EL group. The results in terms of early implant loss in EL versus DL are inconclusive. Besides, crestal bone loss is greater in immediately and delayed loaded implants, at 1 and 3 years of observation, compared to those loaded early. Key words:Dental implants, early dental implant loading, dental prostheses, implant- supported, alveolar bone loss, meta-analysis. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|