A randomized, double‐blind, phase II study of oral histone deacetylase inhibitor resminostat plus S‐1 versus placebo plus S‐1 in biliary tract cancers previously treated with gemcitabine plus platinum‐based chemotherapy
Autor: | Keigo Makino, Hiroshi Ishii, Akihito Tsuji, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno, Shingo Kobayashi, Manabu Muto, Daisuke Sakai, Yoshito Komatsu, Masafumi Ikeda, Nobumasa Mizuno, Akira Fukutomi, Toshikazu Moriwaki, Yousuke Nakai, Masayuki Furukawa, Takeshi Kajiwara, Akio Katanuma, Chigusa Morizane, Yuji Negoro, Masahiro Tsuda, Satoshi Shimizu, Junji Furuse, Noriko Nemoto |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Male Cancer Research medicine.medical_treatment Phases of clinical research Administration Oral Platinum Compounds Hydroxamic Acids Gastroenterology Deoxycytidine Placebos chemistry.chemical_compound 0302 clinical medicine Resminostat Japan Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Original Research Body surface area Sulfonamides Middle Aged lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Progression-Free Survival Drug Combinations Biliary Tract Neoplasms Oncology Fluorouracil 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female medicine.drug Adult medicine.medical_specialty biliary tract cancers Placebo lcsh:RC254-282 Drug Administration Schedule 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult Double-Blind Method Internal medicine medicine Humans systemic chemotherapy Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Adverse effect histone deacetylase inhibitor Aged Tegafur Chemotherapy business.industry Clinical Cancer Research Gemcitabine Oxonic Acid 030104 developmental biology chemistry resminostat plus S‐1 business |
Zdroj: | Cancer Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 6, Pp 2088-2099 (2021) Cancer Medicine |
ISSN: | 2045-7634 |
Popis: | Purpose Effective second‐line chemotherapy options are limited in treating advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Resminostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor. Such inhibitors increase sensitivity to fluorouracil, the active form of S‐1. In the phase I study, addition of resminostat to S‐1 was suggested to have promising efficacy for pre‐treated BTCs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of resminostat plus S‐1 in second‐line therapy for BTCs. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive resminostat or placebo (200 mg orally per day; days 1–5 and 8–12) and S‐1 group (80–120 mg orally per day by body surface area; days 1–14) over a 21‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results Among 101 patients enrolled, 50 received resminostat+S‐1 and 51 received placebo+S‐1. Median PFS was 2.9 months for resminostat+S‐1 vs. 3.0 months for placebo+S‐1 (HR: 1.154, 95% CI: 0.759–1.757, p = 0.502); median OS was 7.8 months vs. 7.5 months, respectively (HR: 1.049, 95% CI: 0.653–1.684, p = 0.834); the RR and DCR were 6.0% vs. 9.8% and 70.0% vs. 78.4%, respectively. Treatment‐related adverse events (TrAEs) of grade ≥ 3 occurring more frequently (≥10% difference) in the resminostat+S‐1 than in the placebo+S‐1 comprised platelet count decreased (18.0% vs. 2.0%) and decreased appetite (16.0% vs. 2.0%). Conclusions Resminostat plus S‐1 therapy improved neither PFS nor OS for patients with pre‐treated BTCs. Addition of resminostat to S‐1 was associated with higher incidence of TrAEs, but these were manageable (JapicCTI‐183883). This randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study investigated the efficacy and safety of resminostat plus S‐1 as a second‐line therapy in patients with BTCs. This was the first randomized study to use S‐1, which is widely used in second‐line treatment for BTC patients in Japan, as an active comparator. The results showed that resminostat plus S‐1 prolonged neither PFS nor OS in comparison with placebo plus S‐1. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |