The short-term effects of Eudragit-L-coated prednisolone metasulphobenzoate (Predocol) on bone formation and bone mineral density in acute ulcerative colitis
| Autor: | John F. Mayberry, Simon J Darlow, Aditya Mandal, Titus Thomas, Barbara Pick, R J Robinson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2004 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty medicine.drug_class Drug Compounding Prednisolone Osteocalcin Anti-Inflammatory Agents Gastroenterology Polymethacrylic Acids Bone Density Osteogenesis Internal medicine medicine Humans Longitudinal Studies Colitis Risk factor Aged Bone mineral Hepatology biology business.industry Middle Aged medicine.disease Ulcerative colitis Confidence interval Treatment Outcome Endocrinology Delayed-Action Preparations Acute Disease biology.protein Corticosteroid Colitis Ulcerative Female business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 16:1173-1176 |
| ISSN: | 0954-691X |
| DOI: | 10.1097/00042737-200411000-00015 |
| Popis: | Background The aetiology of bone loss in ulcerative colitis is multifactorial, but corticosteroid treatment is an important risk factor. A novel formulation of Eudragit-L-coated prednisolone metasulphobenzoate (Predocol) has been developed, in order to deliver high mucosal levels of prednisolone within the colon but with little systemic absorption. The aim of this study was to investigate its efficacy, and short-term effects on bone formation and bone mineral density. Methods In a 12-week longitudinal study 13 patients with active colitis were treated with a reducing dose of Predocol. Disease activity scores were recorded and the bone formation marker osteocalcin was measured before, during and after treatment, with hip and spine bone mineral density assessed at baseline and after treatment. Results Eleven of the 13 patients completed the study. Compared with baseline, disease activity scores improved significantly after 4 weeks [difference in means, 6.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.2, 8.7; P < 0.0001 and 12 weeks (difference in means, 5.7; 95% CI, 3.3,8.2; P < 0.0001) of treatment. Osteocalcin did not fall compared with baseline [16.91 mg/l (95% CI, 12.70, 21.12)], after 4 weeks [13.67 mg/l (95% CI, 8.72, 18.60)] (difference in means, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.37, 8.87; P = 0.23) or 12 weeks [23.91 mg/l (95% CI, 16.10, 31.74)] (difference in means, 13.23; 95% Cl, 2.45,16.48; P = 0.13) of treatment. Similarly, bone mineral density at the hip [0.99 g/cm 2 (95% CI, 0.90, 1.09)] did not change after 12 weeks of treatment [1.00 g/cm 2 (95% CI, 0.89,1.11)] (difference in means, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.25, 0.34; P = 0.74). Spine bone mineral density did not fall from pretreatment levels [1.20 g/cm 2 (95% CI, 1.11, 1.30)] after 12 weeks [1.19 g/cm 2 (95% CI, 1.10, 1.29)] (difference in means, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.004, 0.01; P = 0.26). Conclusions These results confirm that Predocol is effective treatment for acute ulcerative colitis and short courses of the steroid have no adverse effects on bone formation and bone mineral density. The encouraging results from this study suggest that Predocol may be a significant advance in preventing corticosteroid induced bone loss in ulcerative colitis. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|