Cost-effectiveness of ustekinumab in moderate to severe Crohn's disease in Sweden
Autor: | Chrissy Almond, Dana Enkusson, Anders Troelsgaard Buchholt, Linda Karlsson, Indeg Sly, A Hansson-Hedblom, Fredrik Borgström |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Crohn’s disease
medicine.medical_specialty Cost effectiveness Population Vedolizumab 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Internal medicine Ustekinumab Adalimumab medicine education lcsh:R5-920 education.field_of_study Crohn's disease business.industry Health Policy Research medicine.disease Discontinuation 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Cohort 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Cost-effectiveness lcsh:Medicine (General) business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation : C/E Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018) |
ISSN: | 1478-7547 |
Popis: | Background Human monoclonal antibody ustekinumab is a novel Crohn’s disease (CD) treatment blocking pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-12 and 23. The study’s objective was to assess cost-effectiveness of ustekinumab in moderate to severely active CD in Sweden. Methods A cost-effectiveness model with an induction phase decision-tree structure and a maintenance phase Markov cohort structure was constructed. CD was represented by five health-states: remission, mild, moderate-severe, surgery and death. Ustekinumab was compared to adalimumab in patients who had failed conventional care, some of which had tried TNF-alpha-inhibitor(s) without experiencing treatment failure or side effects (“conventional care failure population”) and to vedolizumab in patients previously failing TNF-alpha-inhibitor treatment. Discontinuation probabilities, utilities and ustekinumab induction efficacy were sourced from phase-III trials. Maintenance and comparator efficacy came from network-meta and treatment-sequence analyses. Resource use and unit costs were derived from literature and validated by clinical experts. The analysis had a societal perspective, a life-time time-horizon, and 2-year treatment duration. The results robustness was tested in univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Results Ustekinumab dominated adalimumab in conventional care failure population (costs: − €6984, QALYs: + 0.232). In TNF-alpha-inhibitor failure population ustekinumab accrued 0.133 more QALYs than vedolizumab, yielding a €30,282 incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results were sensitive to decreasing the time horizon and increased treatment duration. At Swedish reference willingness-to-pay of €63,000 (SEK 600,000), ustekinumab had 94% probability of being cost-effective versus adalimumab, and 72% versus vedolizumab. Conclusions Results indicate ustekinumab dominates adalimumab in conventional care failure population, and is cost-effective versus vedolizumab in TNF-alpha-inhibitor failure population. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |