How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests
| Autor: | Grace C. Huang, Yi Yi Lu, Laura Germine, Xiaoshu Zhu, Eliza Passell, Todd S. Horowitz, Luke Scheuer, Melissa Treviño |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Consciousness. Cognition
Experimental psychology Cognitive Neuroscience Trail Making Test Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Neuropsychological Tests 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Continuous performance task Memory span medicine Humans Attention 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Visual search medicine.diagnostic_test Working memory 05 social sciences Cognition Confirmatory factor analysis Memory Short-Term Original Article Factor Analysis Statistical Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Cognitive psychology BF309-499 |
| Zdroj: | Cognitive Research, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-26 (2021) Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications |
| ISSN: | 2365-7464 |
| Popis: | We investigated whether standardized neuropsychological tests and experimental cognitive paradigms measure the same cognitive faculties. Specifically, do neuropsychological tests commonly used to assess attention measure the same construct as attention paradigms used in cognitive psychology and neuroscience? We built on the “general attention factor”, comprising several widely used experimental paradigms (Huang et al., 2012). Participants (n = 636) completed an on-line battery (TestMyBrain.org) of six experimental tests [Multiple Object Tracking, Flanker Interference, Visual Working Memory, Approximate Number Sense, Spatial Configuration Visual Search, and Gradual Onset Continuous Performance Task (Grad CPT)] and eight neuropsychological tests [Trail Making Test versions A & B (TMT-A, TMT-B), Digit Symbol Coding, Forward and Backward Digit Span, Letter Cancellation, Spatial Span, and Arithmetic]. Exploratory factor analysis in a subset of 357 participants identified a five-factor structure: (1) attentional capacity (Multiple Object Tracking, Visual Working Memory, Digit Symbol Coding, Spatial Span), (2) search (Visual Search, TMT-A, TMT-B, Letter Cancellation); (3) Digit Span; (4) Arithmetic; and (5) Sustained Attention (GradCPT). Confirmatory analysis in 279 held-out participants showed that this model fit better than competing models. A hierarchical model where a general cognitive factor was imposed above the five specific factors fit as well as the model without the general factor. We conclude that Digit Span and Arithmetic tests should not be classified as attention tests. Digit Symbol Coding and Spatial Span tap attentional capacity, while TMT-A, TMT-B, and Letter Cancellation tap search (or attention-shifting) ability. These five tests can be classified as attention tests. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink