Reproductive decision-making in the context of hereditary cancer: the effects of an online decision aid on informed decision-making
Autor: | Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen, Charlotte J. Dommering, Christi J. van Asperen, Margriet Collée, Sander M. J. van Kuijk, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Trudy van der Weijden, J.J.G. Gietel-Habets, Kelly Reumkens, Yil Severijns, Marly H. E. Tummers, Cora M. Aalfs, Liesbeth van Osch, Christine E. M. de Die-Smulders, Marleen Kets, Lizet E. van der Kolk |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Human genetics, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life, Targeted Gynaecologic Oncology (TARGON), Damage and Repair in Cancer Development and Cancer Treatment (DARE), RS: GROW - R4 - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine, Genetica & Celbiologie, Ondersteunend personeel ODB, Health promotion, Klinische Genetica, MUMC+: KIO Kemta (9), Epidemiologie, RS: CAPHRI - R2 - Creating Value-Based Health Care, Interne Geneeskunde, MUMC+: MA Medische Oncologie (9), RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy, Family Medicine, RS: CAPHRI - R6 - Promoting Health & Personalised Care, MUMC+: DA KG Polikliniek (9), Clinical Genetics |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
medicine.medical_specialty PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS Epidemiology media_common.quotation_subject Prenatal diagnosis Context (language use) Decisional conflict 030105 genetics & heredity Preimplantation genetic diagnosis BREAST NEEDS 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being medicine Patient participation Genetics (clinical) COUPLES media_common RISK 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Preimplantation genetic testing Public health Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health WOMEN CARRIERS Deliberation CHOICE Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17] Complement (complexity) Hereditary cancer OPTIONS Decision aid Original Article Psychology Clinical psychology |
Zdroj: | Journal of Community Genetics, 12, 101-110 Journal of Community Genetics, 12(1), 101-110. SPRINGER HEIDELBERG Journal of Community Genetics, 12(1), 101-110. Springer Verlag Journal of community genetics, 12. SPRINGER HEIDELBERG Journal of Community Genetics Journal of Community Genetics, 12(1), 101-110. Springer Journal of Community Genetics, 12, 1, pp. 101-110 Journal of Community Genetics, 12(1), 101-110. Springer-Verlag Reumkens, K, Tummers, M H E, Severijns, Y, Gietel-Habets, J J G, van Kuijk, S M J, Aalfs, C M, van Asperen, C J, Ausems, M G E M, Collée, M, Dommering, C J, Kets, M, van der Kolk, L E, Oosterwijk, J C, Tjan-Heijnen, V C G, van der Weijden, T, de Die-Smulders, C E M & van Osch, L A D M 2021, ' Reproductive decision-making in the context of hereditary cancer : the effects of an online decision aid on informed decision-making ', Journal of Community Genetics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 101-110 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-020-00484-2 |
ISSN: | 1868-310X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12687-020-00484-2 |
Popis: | Contains fulltext : 231700.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Individuals having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners face challenging decisions regarding their wish to have children. This study aimed to determine the effects of an online decision aid to support couples in making an informed decision regarding their reproductive options. A nationwide pretest-posttest study was conducted in the Netherlands among 131 participants between November 2016 and May 2018. Couples were eligible for participation if one partner had a pathogenic variant predisposing for an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Participants completed a questionnaire before use (T0), and at 3 months (T3) after use of the decision aid to assess the primary outcome measure informed decision-making, and the secondary outcome measures decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self-efficacy. T0-T3 comparisons show an overall positive effect for all outcome measures (all ps < 0.05; knowledge (ES = - 1.05), decisional conflict (ES = 0.99), participants' decision self-efficacy (ES = -0.55), level of deliberation (ES = - 0.50), and realistic expectations (ES = - 0.44). Informed decision-making increased over time and 58.0% of the participants made an informed reproductive decision at T3. The online decision aid seems to be an appropriate tool to complement standard reproductive counseling to support our target group in making an informed reproductive decision. Use of the decision aid may lessen the negative psychological impact of decision-making on couples' daily life and wellbeing. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |