Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse
Autor: | Mario Trompetto, Gaetano Gallo, Gianluca Pellino, Jacopo Martellucci, R Ghiselli, A. Infantino, Filippo Pucciani |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Gallo, G., Martellucci, J., Pellino, G., Ghiselli, R., Infantino, A., Pucciani, F., Trompetto, M. |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Consensus rectal procidentia surgical treatment Advisory Committees MEDLINE 030230 surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life medicine Humans Digestive System Surgical Procedures Societies Medical abdominal approach Aged Chronic constipation perineal approach business.industry Incidence General surgery Gastroenterology Disease Management Rectal Prolapse Evidence-based medicine Middle Aged Anal canal medicine.disease external rectal prolapse Colorectal surgery non-operative management Rectal prolapse medicine.anatomical_structure Italy Practice Guidelines as Topic Female 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Surgery business Colorectal Surgery Procidentia |
Zdroj: | Techniques in Coloproctology. 22:919-931 |
ISSN: | 1128-045X 1123-6337 |
Popis: | Rectal prolapse, rectal procidentia, "complete" prolapse or "third-degree" prolapse is the full-thickness prolapse of the rectal wall through the anal canal and has a significant impact on quality of life. The incidence of rectal prolapse has been estimated to be approximately 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants with a clear predominance among elderly women. The aim of this consensus statement was to provide evidence-based data to allow an individualized and appropriate management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. The strategy used to search for evidence was based on application of electronic sources such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Review Library, CINAHL and EMBASE. The recommendations were defined and graded based on the current levels of evidence and in accordance with the criteria adopted by the American College of Gastroenterology's Chronic Constipation Task Force. Five evidence levels were defined. The recommendations were graded A, B, and C. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |