Voice disorders in severe obstructive sleep apnea patients and comparison of two acoustic analysis software programs: MDVP and Praat
| Autor: | Peng Lin, Xiaoyu Wang, Honghua Lu, Wei Wang, Mei Wei, Jianqun Du |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Praat Polysomnography Audiology Sensitivity and Specificity Correlation OSAHS 03 medical and health sciences Sleep Apnea Syndromes 0302 clinical medicine Vowel ENT • Original Article Acoustic analysis Supine Position medicine EGG Analysis software Humans Prospective Studies Voice Handicap Index 030223 otorhinolaryngology Electroglottograph Sitting Position Sleep Apnea Obstructive Voice Disorders Receiver operating characteristic business.industry Acoustics MDVP medicine.disease Obstructive sleep apnea Otorhinolaryngology ROC Curve Neurology (clinical) business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Software |
| Zdroj: | Sleep & Breathing = Schlaf & Atmung |
| ISSN: | 1522-1709 |
| Popis: | Objective The purposes of this study were to explore the effect of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) on the voice by analyzing the acoustic parameters between patients with OSAHS and those without OSAHS and to compare acoustic analyses performed by two software programs (MDVP and Praat). Methods Patients with OSAHS (n = 75) and normal controls (n = 46) were asked to produce a sustained sound of the vowel /i/ and were analyzed with electroglottography (EGG), MDVP, and Praat software. A self-rated scale (Voice Handicap Index, VHI-10) and acoustic parameters were compared. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, noise/harmonic ratio (NHR), contact quotient perturbation (CQP), or contact index perturbation (CIP) between the patient group and the normal group. The VHI-10 values were significantly increased in patients with OSAHS. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis suggested that the shimmer obtained from MDVP and Praat possessed relatively high accuracy in differentiating patients with OSAHS from healthy individuals. The results for F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR were significantly different between MDVP and Praat in OSAHS patients. In normal persons, there was a significant difference in NHR; however, no significant differences were found for F0, jitter, or shimmer between the two software programs. The results demonstrated that high correlations were found between values obtained by both software programs. Conclusions Patients with OSAHS were prone to vibration irregularity, incomplete glottal closure, hoarseness, and other vocal problems. The two acoustic software programs present different values of acoustic measures. There was a strong correlation and consistency between the parameters calculated by the two software programs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink