Reliability of 3D dental and skeletal landmarks on CBCT images
| Autor: | Sean Curry, Sean K. Carlson, Heesoo Oh, Sheldon Baumrind, Robert L. Boyd, Joorok Park |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
endocrine system
Cone beam computed tomography endocrine system diseases Cephalometry Computer science Orthodontics Computed tomography 03 medical and health sciences Imaging Three-Dimensional 0302 clinical medicine stomatognathic system 0502 economics and business medicine Humans Computer vision Reliability (statistics) Mouth medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry 05 social sciences Reproducibility of Results Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Original Articles 030206 dentistry Cone-Beam Computed Tomography humanities 050211 marketing Artificial intelligence Anatomic Landmarks business Tooth psychological phenomena and processes |
| Zdroj: | Angle Orthod |
| ISSN: | 1945-7103 0003-3219 |
| DOI: | 10.2319/082018-612.1 |
| Popis: | Objectives: To quantify reliability of three-dimensional skeletal landmarks and a comprehensive set of dental landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to determine the shapes of envelope of error. Materials and Methods: Three judges located 31 skeletal landmarks and 60 dental landmarks on the pre- and posttreatment CBCT images of 22 patients. Landmark error was determined by calculating the distance of deviation of landmark locations around their average. Standard deviation and mean radial spherical error were calculated. Scatterplots were constructed to characterize envelope of error. Results: The midline landmarks of the cranial base were highly reliable. Bilateral skeletal landmarks tended to have larger error than midline landmarks. Among the nonconventional landmarks, fronto-zygomatic suture, condyle, and mental foramen showed relatively high reliability. However, foramen spinosum and temporal fossa showed larger errors. Gonion was the least reliable landmark. Most dental landmarks were located more reliably than skeletal landmarks. The highest reliability was found at incisal edges. Mesiobuccal cusp of first molars also showed high reliability. Conclusions: There were differences in the size and shape of the distributions of errors of different landmarks. Most landmarks showed elongated envelopes. Bilateral structures tended to show greater errors than midline structures. Most dental landmarks were more reliable than skeletal landmarks. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|