Is government contestability an integral part of the definition of democracy?
| Autor: | Aris Trantidis |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
021110 strategic
defence & security studies media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Authoritarianism 0211 other engineering and technologies 02 engineering and technology Liberal democracy L220 Political Systems Democracy 0506 political science L221 Autocracy Representative democracy Politics Pluralism (political theory) L200 Politics Political economy Law Political Science and International Relations 050602 political science & public administration Sociology L210 Political Theories L222 Democracy media_common |
| Zdroj: | Politics. 37:67-81 |
| ISSN: | 1467-9256 0263-3957 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0263395715619635 |
| Popis: | First published online : 19 May 2016 Is government contestability an integral part of the definition of democracy? The answer to this question affects the way we classify political systems in which, despite a formally open political structure, a dominant political group faces weak opposition from other political parties and civil society organizations – an indication of a low degree of government contestability. In Robert Dahl’s polyarchy, contestability is an essential dimension of democracy and, consequently, one-party dominance is classified as an ‘inclusive hegemony’ outside his conception of democracy. For procedural definitions of democracy, however, dominant party systems are legitimate outcomes of electoral competition provided that there have been no formal restrictions to the exercise of civil and political rights. The article examines the boundaries between democracy and authoritarianism, broadens the notion of authoritarian controls to include soft manipulative practices and explains why government contestability should be regarded as a constitutive property of democracy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|