[13C]glucose breath testing provides a noninvasive measure of insulin resistance: calibration analyses against clamp studies
Autor: | Sally A. Schuette, Kieren J. Mather, Robin Chisholm, Maysa Hussain, Robert V. Considine, Morteza Jangorbhani |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Glucose uptake Carbohydrate metabolism Endocrinology Insulin resistance Predictive Value of Tests Reference Values Internal medicine Diabetes mellitus Ingestion Medicine Humans Glycated Hemoglobin Analysis of Variance Carbon Isotopes Kilogram business.industry Reproducibility of Results Fasting Original Articles Glucose clamp technique medicine.disease Medical Laboratory Technology Clamp Glucose Breath Tests Calibration Glucose Clamp Technique Female Insulin Resistance business |
Zdroj: | Diabetes technologytherapeutics. 16(2) |
ISSN: | 1557-8593 |
Popis: | Exhaled (13)CO2 following ingestion of [(13)C]glucose with a standard oral glucose tolerance load correlates with blood glucose values but is determined by tissue glucose uptake. Therefore exhaled (13)CO2 may also be a surrogate measure of the whole-body glucose disposal rate (GDR) measured by the gold standard hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.Subjects from across the glycemia range were studied on 2 consecutive days under fasting conditions. On Day 1, a 75-g oral glucose load spiked with [(13)C]glucose was administered. On Day 2, a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was performed. Correlations between breath parameters and clamp-derived GDR were evaluated, and calibration analyses were performed to evaluate the precision of breath parameter predictions of clamp measures.Correlations of breath parameters with GDR and GDR per kilogram of fat-free mass (GDRffm) ranged from 0.54 to 0.61 and 0.54 to 0.66, respectively (all P0.001). In calibration analyses the root mean square error for breath parameters predicting GDR and GDRffm ranged from 2.32 to 2.46 and from 3.23 to 3.51, respectively. Cross-validation prediction error (CVPE) estimates were 2.35-2.51 (GDR) and 3.29-3.57 (GDRffm). Prediction precision of breath enrichment at 180 min predicting GDR (CVPE=2.35) was superior to that for inverse insulin (2.68) and the Matsuda Index (2.51) but inferior to that for the log of homeostasis model assessment (2.21) and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (2.29) (all P10(-5)). Similar patterns were seen for predictions of GDRffm.(13)CO2 appearance in exhaled breath following a standard oral glucose load with added [(13)C]glucose provides a valid surrogate index of clamp-derived measures of whole-body insulin resistance, with good accuracy and precision. This noninvasive breath test-based approach can provide a useful measure of whole-body insulin resistance in physiologic and epidemiologic studies. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |