Neuroimaging in the Courtroom: Normative Frameworks and Consensual Practices

Autor:	Toine Pieters, Thomas Rinne, D. Horstkoetter, Jos I. M. Egger, C. G. van El, G. de Wert, Maaike Kempes
Přispěvatelé:	Metamedica, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, RS: CAPHRI - Health, Ethics & Society, Human genetics, Ethics, Law & Medical humanities, EMGO - Mental health
Rok vydání:	2014
Předmět:	Experimental Psychopathology and Treatment Neuro- en revalidatiepsychologie Neuroimaging General Neuroscience Neuropsychology and rehabilitation psychology Accountability Normative Plasticity and Memory [DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 3] Suspect Psychology Sentence Epistemology
Zdroj:	Horstkoetter, D, van El, C G, Kempes, M, Egger, J, Rinne, T, Pieters, T & de Wert, G 2014, ' Neuroimaging in the Courtroom: Normative Frameworks and Consensual Practices ', AJOB Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 37-39 . https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2014.884190 AJOB Neuroscience, 5(2), 37-39. Taylor and Francis AJOB Neuroscience, 5, 2, pp. 37-39 AJOB Neuroscience, 5(2), 37-39. Taylor & Francis AJOB Neuroscience, 5, 37-39
ISSN:	2150-7759 2150-7740
DOI:	10.1080/21507740.2014.884190
Popis:	Neuroimaging is increasingly playing a role in courtrooms where judges take into account representations of the suspect's brain as evidence to determine their accountability and the sentence. Berli...
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::db6daf76b43da681cc72969c115abff2 https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2014.884190 Zobrazit plný text záznamu