Application of participation in clinical practice: Key issues

Autor: Lode Sabbe, Dominique Van de Velde, Patricia De Vriendt, Marieke Coussens, Peter Vlerick, Ellen Gorus, Stijn De Baets, Lien Van Malderen, Guy Vanderstraeten
Přispěvatelé: Gerontology, Research in Geriatrics and Gerontology, Frailty in Ageing, UZB Other, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Diabetes Pathology & Therapy
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Biopsychosocial model
social participation
Applied psychology
PROPERTIES
WHO
Disability Evaluation
0302 clinical medicine
International Classification of Functioning
Disability and Health
QUALITY-OF-LIFE
Activities of Daily Living
Medicine and Health Sciences
SPINAL-CORD-INJURY
participation
030212 general & internal medicine
Internal Classification
Empirical evidence
Conceptualization
Rehabilitation
measures
General Medicine
DISABILITY INSTRUMENT
Social Participation
Social engagement
COMMUNITY
INTEGRATION QUESTIONNAIRE
classification
Psychology
WorldHealthOrganization
limitations
WHO
TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY
Physical Therapy
Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
RM1-950
Activities of Daily Living/psychology
World Health Organization
limitations
REHABILITATION-PARTICIPATION
Body of knowledge
03 medical and health sciences
Quality of life (healthcare)
Humans
Disabled Persons
INTERNATIONAL-CLASSIFICATION
Operationalization
030214 geriatrics
ICF
Disabled Persons/rehabilitation
PSYCHOMETRIC
socialparticipation
PERCEIVED PARTICIPATION
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
concept
BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MODEL
Zdroj: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol 50, Iss 8, Pp 679-695 (2018)
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
ISSN: 1651-2081
1650-1977
Popis: Background: Rehabilitation services are increasingly targeting involvement in daily life. In the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health this is referred to as “participation”. How-ever, questions have arisen regarding the conceptualization of participation, and consensus is lacking. Methods: The first phase of this study is a critical review of the literature to detect recurring conceptual problems in the application of participation and how researchers deal with these. The second phase is a systematic review to identify how participation measures are operationalized. Results: The critical review found possible solutions to 4 recurring key limitations: (i) how to deal with ambiguity and vagueness regarding the term “participation”; (ii) how to differentiate between activity and participation; (iii) what is the current empirical knowledge about the subjective aspects of participation; (iv) what are the different ways to measure participation. The systematic review found 18 instruments operationalizing participation in different ways: (i) unidimensional: frequency of performing activities; (ii) unidimensional: limitations in experiencing participation when performing activities; (iii) multidimensional: multiple subjective dimensions when performing activities; and (iv) multidimensional: objective and subjective dimensions. Discussion and conclusion: Notwithstanding an increasing body of knowledge, some issues remain unclear and how participation is measured is subject to debate. This results in difficulties in the use of participation in clinical practice. However, insight into the current body of knowledge and awareness of shortcomings might help clinicians who aim to apply participation in practice.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: