Autor: |
Pauli Huotari, Teivo Teivainen |
Přispěvatelé: |
Bringel, Breno, Pleyers, Geoffrey, Academic Disciplines of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Helsinki Inequality Initiative (INEQ), Helsinki Hub on Emotions, Populism and Polarisation, Political Science, Department of Political and Economic Studies (2010-2017), The Global Extractivisms and Alternatives Initiative |
Rok vydání: |
2022 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Social Movements and Politics During COVID-19 ISBN: 9781529217254 |
DOI: |
10.51952/9781529217254.ch001 |
Popis: |
COVID-19 governance is a new field of power that articulates attempts by states and other institutions to control the pandemic crisis. Within the European Union, it includes a bigger role for central banks and suppression of democratic rights and freedoms in various forms, including tightening external and internal border controls. Finland, where we are based, has had one of the most leftist governments in the European Union and imposed some of the strictest border controls of all the member states during the first months of COVID-19 governance. What does the sudden expansion in state-led governance mean for democratic visions and practices? Our main interest is on horizons that could radicalize democracy, the possibility for the people to take equal part in decisions that concern the basic conditions of their lives. On the one hand, radicalized democracy refers to attempts to bring economic institutions such as capitalist corporations and central banks under greater democratic control. These attempts typically rely on an understanding of democracy that regards parliaments and other democratically elected authorities–and sometimes also popular initiatives or referenda–as the most legitimate source of accountability. At least initially, the effects of the COVID-19 on democracy (in the conventional parliamentary sense) might not be very significant (Rapeli and Saikkonen, 2020). Non |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|