Objective functional results in patients with knee osteoarthritis submitted to a 2-day educational programme: a prospective randomised clinical trial
Autor: | Márcia Uchôa de Rezende, C.H. Cernigoy, Cleidnéia Aparecida Clemente da Silva, Fabiane Elize Sabine de Farias, Olavo Pires de Camargo |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
WOMAC Visual analogue scale medicine.medical_treatment Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Osteoarthritis law.invention rehabilitation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation Randomized controlled trial law joint disease medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Balance (ability) 030203 arthritis & rheumatology functional testing Rehabilitation business.industry Evidence-based medicine medicine.disease Clinical trial Physical therapy Original Article business |
Zdroj: | BMJ Open Sport — Exercise Medicine |
ISSN: | 2055-7647 |
Popis: | Background Although education is recommended for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), its effectiveness in osteoarthritis (OA) remains low according to subjective questionnaires. The timed-up-and-go (TUG) and five-times-sit-to-stand tests (FTSST) reflect muscle strength and balance and could be used as objective measures of effectiveness. Aim To measure the effect of an educational programme in patients with KOA by TUG and FTSST and correlate these results to those of subjective questionnaires. Methods Prospective randomised controlled trial of patients with KOA. Participants (n=198) were allocated into four groups. Three groups participated in 2 days of lectures with 1 (group 1), 2 (group 2) and 3-month (group 3) intervals between classes. Group 4 had no classes. Participants were asked to exercise at least three times a week. Half of the patients from all groups received bimonthly telephone calls reinforcing diet and exercise instructions. All four groups received the printed and video material presented in the classes. At baseline and at 1 year after initial assessment, patients performed the FTSST and TUG and answered WOMAC, Lequesne, SF-36 and Visual Analogue Scale questionnaires. Results The TUG results did not change at 1 year follow-up, whereas FTSST improved (average difference of 4.66, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |