In-Hospital Outcomes of Urgent, Early, or Late Revascularization for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
| Autor: | Christina L. Cui, Hanaa Dakour-Aridi, Jinny J. Lu, Kevin S. Yei, Marc L. Schermerhorn, Mahmoud B. Malas |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Clinical Sciences Endarterectomy Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology Article Time-to-Treatment Cohort Studies Clinical Research Ambulatory Care 80 and over Humans Carotid Stenosis Carotid Retrospective Studies Aged Aged 80 and over Advanced and Specialized Nursing Endarterectomy Carotid Neurology & Neurosurgery Endovascular Procedures Neurosciences Arteries Middle Aged stroke Brain Disorders Hospitalization Treatment Outcome stents Stents Female Neurology (clinical) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine carotid endarterectomy |
| Zdroj: | Stroke, vol 53, iss 1 Stroke |
| ISSN: | 1524-4628 0039-2499 |
| DOI: | 10.1161/strokeaha.120.032410 |
| Popis: | Background and Purpose: Advancements in carotid revascularization have produced promising outcomes in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, the optimal timing of revascularization procedures after symptomatic presentation remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare in-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), transfemoral carotid stenting (TFCAS), or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed within different time intervals after most recent symptoms. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of United States patients in the vascular quality initiative. All carotid revascularizations performed for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between September 2016 and November 2019 were included. Procedures were categorized as urgent (0–2 days after most recent symptom), early (3–14 days), or late (15–180 days). The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital stroke and death. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital stroke, death, and transient ischemic attacks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes. Results: A total of 18 643 revascularizations were included: 2006 (10.8%) urgent, 7423 (39.8%) early, and 9214 (49.42%) late. Patients with TFCAS had the highest rates of stroke/death at all timing cohorts (urgent: 4.0% CEA, 6.9% TFCAS, 6.5% TCAR, P =0.018; early: 2.5% CEA, 3.8% TFCAS, 2.9% TCAR, P =0.054; late: 1.6% CEA, 2.8% TFCAS, 2.3% TCAR, P =0.003). TFCAS also had increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death compared with CEA in all 3 groups (urgent adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0–2.9] P =0.03; early aOR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1–2.4] P =0.01; and late aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2–3.0] P =0.01). TCAR and CEA had comparable odds of in-hospital stroke/death in all 3 groups (urgent aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 0.9–4], P =0.10), (early aOR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.7–1.7], P =0.66), (late aOR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.9–2.3], P =0.08). Conclusions: CEA remains the safest method of revascularization within the urgent period. Among revascularization performed outside of the 48 hours, TCAR and CEA have comparable outcomes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|