The Management of Distal Clavicle Fractures – A Survey of UK Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons
| Autor: | Alison Armstrong, Dhiraj Sharma, Radhakant Pandey, Amit Modi, Vivek Sharma, Harvinder Singh |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Response rate (survey)
medicine.medical_specialty distal clavicle Distal clavicle shoulder business.industry General surgery Elbow Gold standard General Engineering upper limb surgery Trauma law.invention Orthopedics orthopeadics medicine.anatomical_structure Clinical research Randomized controlled trial fracture law Respondent medicine business survery Fixation (histology) |
| Zdroj: | Cureus |
| ISSN: | 2168-8184 |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.17305 |
| Popis: | Background Distal clavicle fractures (DCF) are a management challenge frequently encountered by shoulder surgeons. Despite an array of surgical fixation strategies, the indications and role of surgery are unclear, with there being no gold standard or consensus regarding their management. The aim of this study was to identify current United Kingdom (UK) clinical practices relating to DCFs and to inform a future randomised control trial (RCT). Methods An online survey was sent to the consultant surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Questions covered respondent indications for surgical fixation, important factors considered for management of DCFs, fixation strategies, the volume of patients treated, and willingness to participate in the conduct of a randomized trial. Results The response rate was 84/327 (26%). 64-67% of respondents reported surgically managing DCFs classified as Neer type 2A, 2B and 5. The most important factors considered by surgeons when deciding between operative and nonoperative intervention were degree of displacement (90%), clinical assessment of impending open fracture (87%), and age of the patient (74%). For conservatively managed DCFs, the preferred length of complete immobilization was 2-4 weeks (46%), followed by 4-8 weeks (17%). 30% reported not immobilizing their patients at all. For operative intervention, the locking plate was the preferred fixation method by most respondents (68%), although there was no clear consensus regarding other fixation methods. Most surgeons (52%) reported treating a low volume of patients with DCFs (0-10) per year. 58% of respondents were willing to randomize patients to non-operative treatment in a multi-centre RCT, with a further 22% undecided. Finally, 68% (n=79) of respondents would consider being co-investigators in such a trial. Conclusion There is considerable heterogeneity in the management of patients with DCFs in the UK. The indications for surgery and the optimal surgical fixation method remain uncertain. There is a clear need for pragmatic multi-centre clinical research in this area. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|