Quantitative accuracy of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for cervical cancer
Autor: | Pinakpani Roy, Weili Lin, Amir H. Khandani, Paola A. Gehrig, Tiffany Sills, Jorge Oldan, Julia R. Fielding, Ellen L. Jones |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
lcsh:Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
Cervical cancer medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry lcsh:R895-920 positron emission tomography/computed tomography Standardized uptake value Magnetic resonance imaging positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance medicine.disease Quantitative accuracy 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Positron emission tomography 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis standardized uptake value Medicine Original Article 030212 general & internal medicine business Nuclear medicine Radiation oncologist Oncologic Surgeon Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography |
Zdroj: | World Journal of Nuclear Medicine World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol 17, Iss 4, Pp 213-218 (2018) |
ISSN: | 1607-3312 1450-1147 |
Popis: | With the spread of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR), the question of comparability of studies becomes important. We aim to determine whether PET/MR and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) are comparable for the case of cervical cancer. Fifteen cervical cancer patients identified by either a radiation oncologist or an oncologic surgeon had both PET/MR and PET/CT performed for initial staging within 3 weeks. We then compared the results both quantitatively (measuring standardized uptake values [SUVs] on visible lesions) as well as qualitatively (having radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians interprets the results). While interpretations between PET/MR and PET/CT varied in many cases, SUVs of primary lesions were similar to within 25% in all but one case, and correlation coefficient was 0.92. Maximum SUV ranged between 4.9 and 25.2 for PET-MR and between 5.8 and 30.4 for PET-CT for primary tumors and between 1.5 and 18.8 for PET-MR and between 1.8 and 20.8 for PET-CT for nodes. However, clinical reads often varied significantly between PET/MR and PET/CT. This suggests that SUV is similar on PET/MR and PET/CT although the differing anatomic modalities available for correlation may make the difference in terms of qualitative interpretation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |