Evaluation and comparison of 3D intervertebral disc localization and segmentation methods for 3D T2 MR data: A grand challenge
Autor: | Jurgen Fripp, Martin Urschler, Maria Wimmer, Hao Chen, Hui Cheng, Shuo Li, Chunliang Wang, Robert Korez, Daniel Forsberg, Dieter Felsenberg, Gabriele Armbrecht, Tomaž Vrtovec, Darko Štern, Pheng-Ann Heng, Isabel Lŏpez Andrade, Alexey A. Novikov, Qi Dou, Hugo Hutt, Richard M. Everson, Bulat Ibragimov, Ben Glocker, Guoyan Zheng, Daniel L. Belavý, Ales Neubert, Chengwen Chu, Judith R. Meakin |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Reference data (financial markets)
Health Informatics 02 engineering and technology 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences Imaging Three-Dimensional 0302 clinical medicine 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Segmentation Computer vision Intervertebral Disc 610 Medicine & health Radiological and Ultrasound Technology medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Medical image computing Intervertebral disc Magnetic resonance imaging 620 Engineering Magnetic Resonance Imaging Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design Hausdorff distance medicine.anatomical_structure 570 Life sciences biology 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial intelligence Mr images business Algorithms |
Zdroj: | Medical Image Analysis. 35:327-344 |
ISSN: | 1361-8415 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.005 |
Popis: | The evaluation of changes in Intervertebral Discs (IVDs) with 3D Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging (MRI) can be of interest for many clinical applications. This paper presents the evaluation of both IVD localization and IVD segmentation methods submitted to the Automatic 3D MRI IVD Localization and Segmentation challenge, held at the 2015 International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI2015) with an on-site competition. With the construction of a manually annotated reference data set composed of 25 3D T2-weighted MR images acquired from two different studies and the establishment of a standard validation framework, quantitative evaluation was performed to compare the results of methods submitted to the challenge. Experimental results show that overall the best localization method achieves a mean localization distance of 0.8 mm and the best segmentation method achieves a mean Dice of 91.8%, a mean average absolute distance of 1.1 mm and a mean Hausdorff distance of 4.3 mm, respectively. The strengths and drawbacks of each method are discussed, which provides insights into the performance of different IVD localization and segmentation methods. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |