Effect of spinal decompression therapy and core stabilization exercises in management of lumbar disc prolapse: A single blind randomized controlled trial
| Autor: | Fayaz Khan, Riziq Allah Mustafa Gaowgzeh, Mohamed Faisal Chevidikunnan, Ejlal A BinMulayh |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Post-intervention law.invention Lumbar disc prolapse Randomized controlled trial Rating scale law parasitic diseases medicine Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Single-Blind Method Core (anatomy) Lumbar Vertebrae business.industry Rehabilitation Mean age Middle Aged medicine.disease Decompression Surgical Exercise Therapy Spinal Fusion Treatment Outcome Spinal decompression Physical therapy Female Single blind business Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
| Zdroj: | Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 33(2) |
| ISSN: | 1878-6324 |
| Popis: | Background Spinal decompression therapy (SDT) has recently been used as a conservative treatment for lumbar disc prolapse (LDP). The effectiveness of SDT when compared with other conservative techniques with a well-designed randomized controlled trials is lacking. Objective To find the efficacy of SDT and core stabilization exercises (CSE) on pain and functional disability in individuals with chronic LDP, and to compare with CSE alone. Methods This single blind randomized controlled trial included thirty-one participants with a mean age of 38.68 ± 8.79 having chronic LDP with or without radiating symptoms were included in the study. The study group received SDT with CSE and control group received CSE alone along with interferential therapy for both groups. Pain and disability were estimated by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Modified Oswestry Questionnaire (mOQ). Results The results demonstrated significant within-group improvements in all outcomes in both groups, the mean differences between pre to post intervention in SDT with CSE group were (NRS: 4.75, t= 12.81, p⩽ 0.001) and (mOQ: 45.13, t= 29.34, p⩽ 0.001), while in CSE group (NRS: 2.60, t= 13.67, p⩽ 0.001) and (mOQ: 27.67, t= 24.52, p⩽ 0.001). Conclusions A combination of SDT with CSE has proven to be more significant when compared with CSE alone to reduce pain and disability in subjects with chronic LDP. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|