Serological chemiluminescence immunoassay for the diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Autor: | Wang Huabin, Zhu Yixuan, Shan Xiaoyun, Wu Junqi, He Pin, Lu Xiaodong, Shao Lijia, Xu Yina, Xu Xiaoping, Shen Lihong |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
0301 basic medicine Chemiluminescence immunoassay Clinical Biochemistry Youden's J statistic Antibodies Viral Gastroenterology SARS‐CoV‐2 Serology COVID-19 Testing 0302 clinical medicine antibody Immunology and Allergy Medicine Cutoff Research Articles Aged 80 and over Immunoassay biology Hematology Middle Aged Medical Laboratory Technology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female diagnostic value Antibody Coronavirus Infections Research Article Adult Microbiology (medical) medicine.medical_specialty Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Pneumonia Viral Betacoronavirus 03 medical and health sciences COVID‐19 Internal medicine Humans In patient Pandemics Aged Biochemistry medical Clinical Laboratory Techniques SARS-CoV-2 business.industry Biochemistry (medical) Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health COVID-19 030104 developmental biology Immunoglobulin M Immunoglobulin G Luminescent Measurements biology.protein business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis |
ISSN: | 1098-2825 0887-8013 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jcla.23466 |
Popis: | Objective Dynamic monitoring of the concentration variation of IgM and IgG in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and exploring their diagnostic value for coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19). Methods A total of 15 patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were enrolled as the COVID‐19 group, and 50 patients were enrolled as the control group. The concentrations of SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific antibodies (IgM and IgG) were detected by a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Results According to the cutoff value recommended by the manufacturer (cutoff = 10 AU/mL), the sensitivity, specificity, Youden index (YI), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of IgM were 60%, 100%, 60%, 100%, and 89.29%, respectively; and 86.67%, 100%, 86.67%, 100%, and 96.15%, respectively, for IgG. We reassessed the cutoff value of IgM. When the cutoff value for SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM was 1.83 AU/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, YI, PPV, and NPV were 93.33%, 98%, 91.33%, 93.33%, and 98%, respectively. During dynamic monitoring of the concentrations of IgM and IgG in COVID‐19 patients, we found the shortest times before a patient became IgM and IgG seropositive after symptom onset were 1.5 and 2 days, respectively. The longest times were 7 and 8 days, respectively. The positive rates of SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG both reached 100% in 8‐14 days after symptom onset. Conclusion The IgM cutoff value of 1.83 AU/mL for the diagnosis of COVID‐19 was much better than the cutoff suggested by the manufacturer. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection can be ruled out if antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 are still undetectable 14 days after symptom onset. The new cutoff of IgM improve the diagnostic value. Considering the high diagnostic efficiency of IgG, we chose the day on which the SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG was close to 10.00 AU/mL. Then, we collected IgM data on the same day to select new cutoff values. When the cutoff value of IgM was 1.83 AU/mL, we obtained the maximum YI. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |