Whole-body MRI in children: Would a 3D STIR sequence alone be sufficient for investigating common paediatric conditions? A comparative study
Autor: | Marc Carpentier, Pierre-Alexandre Alois Poletti, Solène Ferrey, Sylviane Hanquinet, Mehrak Anooshiravani, Laura Merlini |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Child abuse
Male Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging Pediatrics medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Whole body mri Whole Body Imaging/methods ddc:616.0757 Sensitivity and Specificity Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Imaging Three-Dimensional Neoplasms Three-Dimensional/methods medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Whole Body Imaging Child Abuse Preschool Child 030203 arthritis & rheumatology business.industry Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis Infant Reproducibility of Results General Medicine Gold standard (test) medicine.disease Predictive value Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pediatrics/methods Histiocytosis Suspected child abuse Bone Diseases/diagnostic imaging Child Preschool Child Abuse/diagnosis Female Radiology Bone Diseases business Pediatric population |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 88 (2017) pp. 155-162 |
ISSN: | 1872-7727 0720-048X |
Popis: | Objectives To test the performance of a single 3D IR T2-Weighted sequence compared to a Whole-body MRI protocol including DWI, T1-Weighted and STIR 3D IR (3S) in a pediatric population. Methods Two radiologists (15 and 30 years of experience),reviewed WBMRIs: first the STIR alone and 2 weeks later the 3S protocol. The indications were variable. Only positive findings were explicitly reported. A third reader compared the results to gold standard (GS) exams specific for the pathology. Agreement between the two readers, sensitivity and positive predictive value of STIR were calculated. Results fifty-four WBMRIs were included (16 suspected child abuse, 8 chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), 11 lymphomas, 4 osteosarcomas, 9 neuroblastomas, 6 histiocytosis). The mean age was 6 years 10 months, range: 1 month to 15 years. Agreement between readers was of 0.87 [0.82–0.91] for 3D STIR, and 0.89 [0.83–0.93] for the 3S protocol. For reader 1 sensitivity of 3D STIR was 81.6% and of 3S 81.0%. For reader 2 it was 74.1% for 3D STIR and 74.7% for 3S. For both readers and for both protocols, the positive predictive value (PPV) depended on the type of disease (for example 100% histocytosis and osteosarcomas, >90% for child abuse, >85% CRMO but Conclusions Sensitivities were not different between the 2 protocols, for each reader and were different between the 2 readers for each protocol. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |