Analysis of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Flat Solar Collector with Rectangular and Cylindrical Geometry Using CFD**Chicago citation style Marroquín-De Jesús, Ángel, Juan Manuel Olivares-Ramírez, Omar Jiménez-Sandoval, Marco Antonio Zamora-Antuñano, Armando Encinas-Oropesa. Analysis of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Flat Solar Collector with Rectangular and Cylindrical Geometry Using CFD. Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, XIV, 04 (2013): 553–561.ISO 690 citation style Marroquín-De Jesús A., Olivares-Ramírez J.M., Jiménez-Sandoval O.J., Zamora-Antuñano M.A., Encinas-Oropesa A.E. Analysis of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Flat Solar Collector with Rectangular and Cylindrical Geometry Using CFD. Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, volume XIV (issue 4), October-December 2013: 553–561
Autor: | Ángel Marroquín-De Jesús, O. Jiménez-Sandoval, Marco Antonio Zamora-Antuñano, J.M. Olivares-Ramírez, Armando Encinas-Oropesa |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Materials science
business.industry solar radiation flujo estructural Maximum flow problem flat solar collectors Reynolds number Mechanics Computational fluid dynamics Solar energy Flow measurement radiación solar symbols.namesake Cross section (physics) flow structure Optics simulation cfd heat transfer Heat transfer transferencia de calor symbols Working fluid simulación en CFD colector solar plano business |
Zdroj: | Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología. 14:553-561 |
ISSN: | 1405-7743 |
DOI: | 10.1016/s1405-7743(13)72265-0 |
Popis: | The present investigation describes the construction and experimentation of two solar energy absorbersusing water as working fluid and its simulation in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). For Absorber A with rectangular cross section and Absorber B with circular cross section, water temperature was calculated using solar radiation and ambient temperature measurements showing increases of up to 62.5°C for both absorbers. The maximum thermosiphonic flow measurement in Absorber A was 701/h and 791/h in Absorber B. On this basis, finite element method and CFD were used to analyze the difference between both flows, with 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 and 70 1/h as simulation values. With the simulation results the Reynolds numbers were determined, finding that the maximum flow (70 1/h) gives the largest Reynolds number variation: 25 ≤ Re ≤ 115 for Absorber A and 199 ≤ Re ≤ 235 for Absorber B. With a smaller variation in Absorber B, the flow at all ducts turns out to be more uniform, which results in more ducts transferring heat to the working fluid. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |