The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression
| Autor: | Pasquale De Fazio, Giorgio Pigato, Andrea Toncini, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Cristina Scarpazza, Gianmarco Tessari, Giuseppe Sartori, Tiziano Meneghel, Merylin Monaro, Stefano Ferracuti |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
lcsh:RC435-571
050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences Indirect costs 0302 clinical medicine Malingering lcsh:Psychiatry Healthy volunteers medicine 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Depression (differential diagnoses) Depressive symptoms decetpion Compensation (psychology) 05 social sciences Automatic Decetpion Depression Machine learning Psychiatry and Mental Health Mental disease medicine.disease Test (assessment) machine learning depression automatic malingering Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol 9 (2018) |
| ISSN: | 1664-0640 |
| Popis: | Major depression is a high-prevalence mental disease with major socio-economic impact, for both the direct and the indirect costs. Major depression symptoms can be faked or exaggerated in order to obtain economic compensation from insurance companies. Critically, depression is potentially easily malingered, as the symptoms that characterize this psychiatric disorder are not difficult to emulate. Although some tools to assess malingering of psychiatric conditions are already available, they are principally based on self-reporting and are thus easily faked. In this paper, we propose a new method to automatically detect the simulation of depression, which is based on the analysis of mouse movements while the patient is engaged in a double-choice computerized task, responding to simple and complex questions about depressive symptoms. This tool clearly has a key advantage over the other tools: the kinematic movement is not consciously controllable by the subjects, and thus it is almost impossible to deceive. Two groups of subjects were recruited for the study. The first one, which was used to train different machine-learning algorithms, comprises 60 subjects (20 depressed patients and 40 healthy volunteers); the second one, which was used to test the machine-learning models, comprises 27 subjects (9 depressed patients and 18 healthy volunteers). In both groups, the healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to the liars and truth-tellers group. Machine-learning models were trained on mouse dynamics features, which were collected during the subject response, and on the number of symptoms reported by participants. Statistical results demonstrated that individuals that malingered depression reported a higher number of depressive and non-depressive symptoms than depressed participants, whereas individuals suffering from depression took more time to perform the mouse-based tasks compared to both truth-tellers and liars. Machine-learning models reached a classification accuracy up to 96% in distinguishing liars from depressed patients and truth-tellers. Despite this, the data are not conclusive, as the accuracy of the algorithm has not been compared with the accuracy of the clinicians; this study presents a possible useful method that is worth further investigation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|