Safety and efficacy of insulin glargine 300 u/mL compared with other basal insulin therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis
Autor: | Christian Frois, Aleksandra Vlajnic, Quanwu Zhang, Daisy Zhuo, Hsing-wen Chung, Hongwei Wang, Walter Lehmacher, Charles Gerrits, Nick Freemantle, Eric Q. Wu, Engels Chou |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Population Insulin Glargine 030209 endocrinology & metabolism NPH insulin Cochrane Library Lower risk Gastroenterology law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine medicine Humans Hypoglycemic Agents 030212 general & internal medicine education Glycated Hemoglobin education.field_of_study DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY Insulin glargine business.industry Research Body Weight nutritional and metabolic diseases Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus General Medicine Hypoglycemia Diabetes and Endocrinology Endocrinology Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Basal (medicine) business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | BMJ Open |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009421 |
Popis: | Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of a concentrated formulation of insulin glargine (Gla-300) with other basal insulin therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design This was a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised clinical trials of basal insulin therapy in T2DM identified via a systematic literature review of Cochrane library databases, MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Outcome measures Changes in HbA1c (%) and body weight, and rates of nocturnal and documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia were assessed. Results 41 studies were included; 25 studies comprised the main analysis population: patients on basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT). Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was comparable between Gla-300 and detemir (difference: −0.08; 95% credible interval (CrI): −0.40 to 0.24), neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH; 0.01; −0.28 to 0.32), degludec (−0.12; −0.42 to 0.20) and premixed insulin (0.26; −0.04 to 0.58). Change in body weight was comparable between Gla-300 and detemir (0.69; −0.31 to 1.71), NPH (−0.76; −1.75 to 0.21) and degludec (−0.63; −1.63 to 0.35), but significantly lower compared with premixed insulin (−1.83; −2.85 to −0.75). Gla-300 was associated with a significantly lower nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate versus NPH (risk ratio: 0.18; 95% CrI: 0.05 to 0.55) and premixed insulin (0.36; 0.14 to 0.94); no significant differences were noted in Gla-300 versus detemir (0.52; 0.19 to 1.36) and degludec (0.66; 0.28 to 1.50). Differences in documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia rates of Gla-300 versus detemir (0.63; 0.19to 2.00), NPH (0.66; 0.27 to 1.49) and degludec (0.55; 0.23 to 1.34) were not significant. Extensive sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings. Conclusions NMA comparisons are useful in the absence of direct randomised controlled data. This NMA suggests that Gla-300 is also associated with a significantly lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with NPH and premixed insulin, with glycaemic control comparable to available basal insulin comparators. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |