Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
Autor: | Dirk R. Bulian, Jurgen Meyer, Michael A. Ströhlein, Markus M. Heiss, Jonas Lange, Panagiotis Thomaidis, Marie Derstadt, Claudia S. Seefeldt |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery medicine.medical_specialty Science Analgesic Article Inflammatory bowel disease Abdominal wall 03 medical and health sciences Colonic Diseases 0302 clinical medicine Clinical trials Postoperative Complications Colon Sigmoid medicine Humans Minimally invasive procedures Diverticulitis Pain Postoperative Multidisciplinary business.industry Retrospective cohort study Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery Length of Stay Middle Aged medicine.disease Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Vagina Medicine Female Laparoscopy business Body mass index 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Sigmoid resection |
Zdroj: | Scientific Reports Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 |
Popis: | The aim was to compare short-term results of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES (NSR) with traditional laparoscopic technique in sigmoid resection (LSR) in cases of diverticulitis. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery has been evolved as a minimally invasive procedure to reduce the operative trauma due to the absence of specimen extraction through the abdominal wall causing less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay. Despite the increasing use and published case series of NSR for diverticulitis as a laparoscopic procedure with transvaginal stapling and specimen extraction, there are no studies comparing this procedure with LSR. Twenty NSR patients operated at the Cologne-Merheim Medical Center have been documented and compared with 20 female LSR patients matched for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists-classification (ASA), Hansen/Stock classification, and age. To ensure comparability regarding peri- and postoperative care, only procedures performed by the same surgeon were included. Procedural time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate, postoperative pain, the duration of an epidural catheter, analgesic consumption, and postoperative length of hospital stay were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the sum of pain levels (p = 0.930), length of procedure (p = 0.079), intra- and postoperative complications, as well as duration of an epidural catheter. On the contrary, there were significant positive effects for NSR on morphine requirement at day seven and eight (p = 0.019 and p = 0.035 respectively) as well as the postoperative length of hospital stay (p = 0.031). This retrospective study reveals significant positive effects for NSR compared to LSR regarding length of hospital stay as well as morphine consumption after removal of the epidural catheter, whereas there were no significant differences in complication rate and procedural time. In summary, NSR is an adequate alternative to traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection considering the surgeons experience and the patient’s personal preferences. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |