Spectrum of Saccade System Function in Alzheimer Disease
| Autor: | Jon Currie, Ruxsana Shafiq-Antonacci, Paul Maruff, Colin L. Masters |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2003 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Population Neurological disorder Audiology Sensitivity and Specificity Central nervous system disease Degenerative disease Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Alzheimer Disease Reaction Time Saccades medicine Humans Dementia education Aged Aged 80 and over education.field_of_study Cognition Middle Aged medicine.disease Case-Control Studies Saccade Female Neurology (clinical) Alzheimer's disease Psychology Neuroscience |
| Zdroj: | Archives of Neurology. 60 |
| ISSN: | 0003-9942 |
| Popis: | Background In Alzheimer disease (AD), tests of "first-order capabilities," such as reaction time or motor ability, might measure central nervous system integrity or disability more reliably than those of abstract, conceptual, or cognitive behavior. Saccade system impairments are present in AD, but their sensitivity or specificity remains unevaluated. Objectives To determine sensitivity and specificity of saccade measures for AD, precise impairments in AD, and the relationship between dementia severity and saccade system function. Design Case-control study comparing saccade system function between patients and control subjects, including correlations between saccade system function and dementia severity in patients and standardized scores examining impairment in individual patients. Setting Neuropsychiatric research institute. Participants Two hundred forty-five healthy volunteers from the general population, and 35 patients with AD referred by memory clinics. Age- and sex-matched controls were compared with patients on random saccade (n = 35), predictive saccade (n = 11), and antisaccade (n = 18) tasks. Main Outcome Measures Saccade latencies, velocities, and accuracies and antisaccade error rates. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive positive and negative values were calculated using all control data. Results Patients had longer and more variable latencies, more hypometric and anticipatory random saccades, and higher antisaccade error rates ( P r = −0.59, P = .02). Antisaccade measures were the most specific (0.70-0.90) and random saccade gain the most sensitive (0.87). Conclusions Despite AD group impairment, individual patients function within the control range, reducing the sensitivity and specificity of saccade measures for AD. Longitudinal evaluation may provide more reliable classification. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|