Patient participation in the clinical encounter and clinical practice guidelines: The case of patients’ participation in a GRADEd world
| Autor: | Brian S. Baigrie, Amiram Gafni, Mathew Mercuri |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
History
Medical education education.field_of_study Root (linguistics) Process (engineering) Tying Decision Making Perspective (graphical) Population Paternalism History and Philosophy of Science Practice Guidelines as Topic Humans Female Patient Participation Patient participation Decision-making education Psychology Decision Making Shared |
| Zdroj: | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 85:192-199 |
| ISSN: | 0039-3681 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.10.008 |
| Popis: | It is widely acknowledged that the patient's perspective should be considered when making decisions about how her care will be managed. Patient participation in the decision making process may play an important role in bringing to light and incorporating her perspective. The GRADE framework is touted as an evidence-based process for determining recommendations for clinical practice; i.e. determining how care ought to be managed. GRADE recommendations are categorized as “strong” or “weak” based on several factors, including the “values and preferences” of a “typical” patient. The strength of the recommendation also provides instruction to the clinician about when and how patients should participate in the clinical encounter, and thus whether an individual patient's values and preferences will be heard in her clinical encounter. That is, a “strong” recommendation encourages “paternalism” and a “weak” recommendation encourages shared decision making. We argue that adoption of the GRADE framework is problematic to patient participation and may result in care that is not respectful of the individual patient's values and preferences. We argue that the root of the problem is the conception of “values and preferences” in GRADE – the framework favours population thinking (e.g. “typical” patient “values and preferences”), despite the fact that “values and preferences” are individual in the sense that they are deeply personal. We also show that tying the strength of a recommendation to a model of decision making (paternalism or shared decision making) constrains patient participation and is not justified (theoretically and/or empirically) in the GRADE literature. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect