Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults: a scoping review
| Autor: | William E. Hodgetts, Peter Monksfield, Brian J. McKinnon, Ravi Sockalingam, P. Hill-Feltham, Martin Johansson, Amberley Ostevik, Tracy Wright, James R. Tysome |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Linguistics and Language medicine.medical_specialty Hearing loss medicine.medical_treatment Hearing Loss Conductive Audiology Deafness Language and Linguistics 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing 0302 clinical medicine Hearing Outcome Assessment Health Care otorhinolaryngologic diseases Medicine Humans 030223 otorhinolaryngology Hearing Loss Hearing Loss Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural Rehabilitation business.industry Outcome measures medicine.disease Conductive hearing loss Treatment Outcome medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | International journal of audiology. 60(4) |
| ISSN: | 1708-8186 |
| Popis: | Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area.Scoping review.Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss.The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery.A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|