Novel method of fitting of children with auditory brainstem implants
| Autor: | M. Polak, Liliana Colletti, Vittorio Colletti |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Auditory perception
medicine.medical_specialty Auditory response Audiology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Evoked Potentials Auditory Brain Stem otorhinolaryngologic diseases Auditory Brain Stem Implants Humans Medicine 030223 otorhinolaryngology Electrode placement Retrospective Studies Postoperative Care Intraoperative Care business.industry Infant Newborn Infant Mean age Auditory brainstem response Acoustic Stimulation Otorhinolaryngology Child Preschool Surgery Brainstem business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Auditory brainstem implant |
| Zdroj: | European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 135:403-409 |
| ISSN: | 1879-7296 |
| Popis: | Objectives To develop a reliable and objective fitting method for use with young children with an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Materials and methods Subjects were 17 young children implanted with an ABI with the mean age 2 years and 4 months (8–64 months). Evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) measurements were performed intraoperatively and at activation in order to record the auditory response and non-auditory side effects. Each child was tested to observe any subjective responses to the electric stimuli and non-auditory side effects. All children were fitted based on the postoperative eABR. The minimum follow up time was 12 months. Results Intraoperatively an eABR could be obtained in all children. The responses were recordable from 75–100% of all electrodes. At initial stimulation eABR were recordable in all children. The eABR was obtained in 79.7% of all electrodes (25–100%) with a mean eABR threshold of 22.3 nC. eABR without any non-auditory stimulation was recorded on all electrodes in 11 children. Mixed eABR and non-auditory responses were recorded on 2–6 electrodes in 6 children. The subjective auditory responses for at least 1 electrode were noted in 15 children. In the 2 remaining cases the auditory response was obtained only when the device was activated. In all children the subjective responses were within the estimated dynamic range for each electrode. Each child was able to accept up to 100% of volume of the created map. The non-auditory response was observed only on children and electrodes with mixed eABR and non-auditory responses. The mean CAP score at 6 months after the activation was 2.4 (1–4). Conclusions eABR seems to be a reliable tool to judge ABI electrode placement and a reliable method for fitting of young children with an ABI. The data suggest that eABR-based fitting helps children to more quickly achieve auditory perception and development. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect