Minimally invasive pancreatic resections: cost and value perspectives
| Autor: | Kevin C. Conlon, Thijs de Rooij, Jony van Hilst, Mohammad Abu Hidal, Julie Fleshman, Mark Talamonti, Tsafrir Vanounou, Richard Garfinkle, Vic Velanovich, David Kooby, Charles M. Vollmer, Horacio J. Asbun, Jeffrey Barkun, Marc G.H. Besselink, Ugo Boggi, Kevin C.P. Conlon, Ho-Seong Han, Paul D. Hansen, Michael L. Kendrick, David A. Kooby, Andre L. Montagnini, C. Palanivelu, Bård I. Røsok, Shailesh V. Shrikhande, Go Wakabayashi, Herbert Zeh |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Other departments, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Hepatology Cost–benefit analysis business.industry medicine.medical_treatment General surgery Gastroenterology MEDLINE 030230 surgery Societal level Malignant disease 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Pancreatectomy medicine business Value (mathematics) Healthcare system |
| Zdroj: | HPB: The official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 19(3), 225-233. John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
| ISSN: | 1365-182X |
| Popis: | Background The number of minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) performed for benign or malignant disease, have increased in recent years. However, there is limited information regarding cost/value implications. Methods An international conference evaluating MIPR was held during the 12th Bi-Annual International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) World Congress in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on April 20th, 2016. This manuscript summarizes the presentations that reviewed current topics in cost and value as they pertain to MIPR. Results Compared to the open approach, MIPR's are associated with higher operative costs but lower postoperative costs. However, measurements of patient value (defined as improvement in both quantity and quality of life) and financial value (using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) are required to determine the true value at societal level. Conclusion Challenges remain as to how the potential benefits, both to the patient and the healthcare system as a whole, are measured. Research comparing MIPR versus other techniques for pancreatectomy will require appropriate and valid measurement tools, some of which are yet to be refined. Nonetheless, the experience to date would support the continued development of MIPR by experienced surgeons in high-volume pancreatic centers, married with appropriate review and recalibration. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|