Meta‐analysis of arbidol versus lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019
Autor: | Li-Yan Huang, Sheng Li, Jian Wei, Yue-Hua Lei, Miao Yu, Deng-Chao Wang |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Indoles Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Lopinavir/ritonavir Sulfides Cochrane Library Antiviral Agents Gastroenterology Lopinavir Virology Internal medicine medicine Humans Ritonavir SARS-CoV-2 business.industry COVID-19 virus diseases COVID-19 Drug Treatment Drug Combinations Treatment Outcome Infectious Diseases Meta-analysis Improvement rate business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Journal of Medical Virology. 94:1513-1522 |
ISSN: | 1096-9071 0146-6615 |
Popis: | Objectives To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) using a meta-analysis method. Methods The China Knowledge Network, VIP database, WanFang database PubMed database, Embase database, and Cochrane Library were searched for a collection of comparative studies on Arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019. Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19. Results The results of the systematic review indicated that Arbidol had a higher positive-to-negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid on Day 7 [P=0.03], a higher positive-to-negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid on Day 14 [P=0.006], a higher improvement rate of chest CT on Day 14 [P=0.02], a lower incidence of adverse reactions [P=0.002] and lower rate of mortality[P=0.007]. There was no difference in the rate of cough disappearance on Day 14 [P=0.24] or the rate of severe/critical illness [P=0.07] between the two groups. Conclusions Arbidol may be superior tolopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19. However, due to the small number of included studies and the number of patients, high-quality multi-centre large-sample randomized double-blind controlled trials are still needed for verification. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |