Platelet counting in platelet concentrates with various automated hematology analyzers

Autor: Willeke Kuipers, Janny de Wildt-Eggen, M. J. Dijkstra-Tiekstra, Airies C. Setroikromo
Rok vydání: 2007
Předmět:
Zdroj: Transfusion. 47:1651-1657
ISSN: 1537-2995
0041-1132
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01337.x
Popis: BACKGROUND: Hematology analyzers use impedance, optical, and/or immunologic techniques for counting platelets (PLTs). PLT counting in whole blood has been validated thoroughly; however, this is not the case for PLT counting in PLT concentrates (PCs), in which red cells (RBCs) are absent. Therefore, this study is focused on PLT counting in PCs to study use of ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), carryover, and accuracy of the analyzers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total six hematology analyzers (AcT 8, Beckman Coulter; ADVIA 2120, Bayer; Cell-Dyn 4000, Abbott; Onyx, Beckman Coulter; K4500, Sysmex; and XT 2000i, Sysmex) were tested for PLT counting. PC samples with various PLT concentrations were made (0-1700 × 109/L) and measured 10 times. Carryover was determined five times. RESULTS: PC samples (1000 × 109 PLTs/L) in EDTA tubes showed significantly higher PLT counts than samples in “dry” tubes for all analyzers except for the Cell-Dyn 4000 with the impedance technique. Carryover was not more than 0.3 percent for all analyzers. The K4500 showed the most accurate results, whereas the Cell-Dyn 4000 with the impedance technique had low accuracy due to an overestimation of more than 20 percent. CONCLUSION: Most tested analyzers seemed to be suitable for counting PLTs in PCs. All hematology analyzers should be validated for counting PLTs in absence of RBCs as is the case in PCs, in addition to validation of PLT counting in whole blood.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: