Weaving the threads of international criminal justice: The double dialogicity of law and politics in the ICC al-Mahdi case
Autor: | Jonas Bens, Baudouin Dupret, Sigurd D'hondt |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | University of Jyväskylä (JYU), Les Afriques dans le monde (LAM), Sciences Po Bordeaux - Institut d'études politiques de Bordeaux (IEP Bordeaux)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Bordeaux-Université Bordeaux Montaigne-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Free University of Berlin (FU), Sciences Po Bordeaux - Institut d'études politiques de Bordeaux (IEP Bordeaux)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Bordeaux-Université Bordeaux Montaigne (UBM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Cultural Studies
uutisointi tuhot dialogicity dialogical network Context (language use) International Criminal Court dialoginen analyysi Politics Timbuktu Political science dialogisuus Relevance (law) 0601 history and archaeology kansainvälinen rikosoikeus 060201 languages & linguistics 060101 anthropology [SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology Mahdi Communication Dialogical self International community Islam 06 humanities and the arts cultural heritage 16. Peace & justice diskurssintutkimus kulttuuriperintö Law 0602 languages and literature oikeudenkäynti Criminal justice |
Zdroj: | Discourse, Context & Media Discourse, Context & Media, 2021, 44, pp.100545. ⟨10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100545⟩ |
ISSN: | 2211-6958 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100545⟩ |
Popis: | International audience; In this paper, we examine the international criminal trial of Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi, a Malian Islamist who appeared before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, charged with the destruction of Islamic shrines during the 2012 jihadist occupation of Timbuktu. Our objective is to analyze the so-called 'al-Mahdi case' as a dialogical network (the destructions occurred in the context of an asynchronous translocal press-mediated exchange between jihadists and the international community) and as an event unfolding at a dialogical site (when the commander responsible for the destructions was referred to the ICC four years later). These two dialogical orders exist largely independent of each other, but are at crucial points also partly entangled. We conclude by pointing out the relevance of this 'doubly-dialogical' approach to the broader field of sociolegal studies of international criminal justice. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |