Is Nasal High Flow Inferior to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Neonates?
| Autor: | Peter G Davis, Brett J. Manley, Kate A Hodgson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Nursing staff
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Respiratory distress business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Extremely preterm Infant Newborn Oxygen Inhalation Therapy Obstetrics and Gynecology Gestational Age Infant Premature Diseases Nose 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Infant Extremely Premature 030225 pediatrics Anesthesia Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health medicine Humans Gestation 030212 general & internal medicine Continuous positive airway pressure High flow business |
| Zdroj: | Clinics in Perinatology. 46:537-551 |
| ISSN: | 0095-5108 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.clp.2019.05.005 |
| Popis: | Nasal high-flow therapy (nHF) is increasingly used for neonates, with perceived benefits including reduced rates of nasal trauma and parent and nursing staff preference. Current evidence suggests that although nHF is a reasonable alternative for postextubation support of preterm infants, continuous positive airway pressure is a superior modality for primary support of respiratory distress syndrome. Minimal evidence exists for use of nHF in extremely preterm infants less than 28 weeks' gestation. Depending on clinician preference, units may still choose nHF in some settings, although careful choice of appropriate patients, and availability of rescue continuous positive airway pressure, is essential. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|