Suspended particulate matter collection methods influence the quantification of polycyclic aromatic compounds in the river system

Autor: Catherine Lorgeoux, Luc Manceau, Valéry Collin, Laurence Mansuy, Renaud Gley, Hussein Jaafar Kanbar, Fayez Abuhelou, Delphine Catteloin, Allan Bauer, Fabien Thomas, Emmanuelle Montargès-Pelletier
Přispěvatelé: Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux (LIEC), Institut Ecologie et Environnement (INEE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Terre et Environnement de Lorraine (OTELo), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Zone Atelier du Bassin de la Moselle [LTSER France] (ZAM), Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), GeoRessources, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre de recherches sur la géologie des matières premières minérales et énergétiques (CREGU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS), Centre de Recherche en Géographie (LOTERR), Université de Lorraine (UL)
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer Verlag, 2017, 24 (28), pp.22717-22729. ⟨10.1007/s11356-017-9840-5⟩
ISSN: 1614-7499
0944-1344
Popis: International audience; In this study, we compared the influence of two different collection methods, filtration (FT) and continuous flow field centrifugation (CFC) on the concentration and the distribution of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in suspended particulate matter (SPM) occurring in river waters. SPM samples were collected simultaneously with FT and CFC from a river during six sampling campaigns over two years, covering different hydrological contexts. SPM samples were analyzed to determine the concentration of PACs including 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 11 oxygenated PACs (O-PACs) and 5 nitrogen PACs (N-PACs). Results showed significant differences between the two separation methods. In half of the sampling campaigns, PAC concentrations differed from a factor 2 to 30 comparing FT and CFC collected SPMs. The PAC distributions were also affected by the separation method. FT-collected SPM were enriched in 2-3 ring PACs whereas CFC-collected SPM had PAC distributions dominated by medium to high molecular weight compounds typical of combustion processes. This could be explained by distinct cutoff threshold of the two separation methods and strongly suggested the retention of colloidal and/or fine matter on glass-fiber filters particularly enriched in low molecular PACs. These differences between FT and CFC were not systematic but rather enhanced by high water flow rates.
Databáze: OpenAIRE