Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: Long-term results of the SABR-COMET Phase II randomized trial

Autor: X. Melody Qu, Belal Ahmad, Stewart Gaede, Roel Schlijper, Sashendra Senthi, Mitchell Liu, Michael Lock, Glenn Bauman, Robert Olson, Anand Swaminath, Liam Mulroy, George Rodrigues, Devin Schellenberg, Stephen Harrow, Brian Yaremko, Alexander V. Louie, Andrew Warner, Joanna Laba, Neil Kopek, David A. Palma, Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek, Suresh Senan, S. Currie, Karen Moore
Přispěvatelé: Radiation Oncology, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(25), 2830-2838. American Society of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Palma, D A, Olson, R, Harrow, S, Gaede, S, Louie, A V, Haasbeek, C, Mulroy, L, Lock, M, Rodrigues, G B, Yaremko, B P, Schellenberg, D, Ahmad, B, Senthi, S, Swaminath, A, Kopek, N, Liu, M, Moore, K, Currie, S, Schlijper, R, Bauman, G S, Laba, J, Qu, X M, Warner, A & Senan, S 2020, ' Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers : Long-term results of the SABR-COMET Phase II randomized trial ', Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 38, no. 25, pp. 2830-2838 . https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00818
ISSN: 0732-183X
Popis: PurposeThe oligometastatic paradigm hypothesizes that patients with a limited number of metastases may achieve long-term disease control, or even cure, if all sites of disease can be ablated. However, long-term randomized data testing this paradigm are lacking.MethodsWe enrolled patients with a controlled primary malignancy and 1-5 metastatic lesions, with all metastases amenable to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). We stratified by the number of metastases (1-3 vs. 4-5) and randomized in a 1:2 ratio between palliative standard of care (SOC) treatments (Arm 1) vs. SOC plus SABR (Arm 2). We employed a randomized phase II screening design with a primary endpoint of overall survival (OS), using an alpha of 0.20 (wherein a p-value ResultsBetween 2012 and 2016, 99 patients were randomized (33 in Arm 1, 66 in Arm 2) at 10 centres internationally. Median age was 68 (range 43-89) and the majority (n=59; 60%) were male. The most common primary tumor types were breast (n=18), lung (n=18), colorectal (n=18), and prostate (n=16). Median follow-up was 51 months. Five-year OS was 17.7% in Arm 1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6-34%) vs. 42.3% in Arm 2 (95% CI: 28-56%; stratified log-rank p=0.006). Five-year PFS was ‘not reached’ in Arm 1 (3.2% [95% CI: 0-14%] at 4-years with last patient censored) and was 17.3% (95% CI: 8-30%) in Arm 2 (p=0.001). There were no new grade 2-5 adverse events and no differences in QOL between arms.ConclusionsWith extended follow-up, the impact of SABR on OS was larger in magnitude than in the initial analysis, and durable over time. There were no new safety signals, and SABR had no detrimental impact on QOL. (NCT01446744)FundingOntario Institute for Cancer Research and London Regional Cancer Program Catalyst Grant
Databáze: OpenAIRE