Sustainability Assessment of Combined Animal Fodder and Fuel Production from Microalgal Biomass
Autor: | Benjamin W. Portner, Sandy Guenther, Antonio Valente |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Health
Toxicology and Mutagenesis Biomass Climate change Environment Article fodder Agricultural science Fodder life cycle assessment Animals Land use land-use change and forestry Life-cycle assessment biorefinery Ecological footprint Land use LCA microalgae feed Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Eutrophication Animal Feed Biofuels Sustainability Environmental science SLCA Medicine fuel |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11351, p 11351 (2021) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (21) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Volume 18; Issue 21; Pages: 11351 |
ISSN: | 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
Popis: | We present a comparative environmental and social life cycle assessment (ELCA and SLCA) of algal fuel and fodder co-production (AF + fodder) versus algal fuel and energy co-production (AF + energy). Our ELCA results indicate that fodder co-production offers an advantage in the following categories: climate change (biogenic land use and land use change total), ecotoxicity, marine eutrophication, ionizing radiation, photochemical ozone creation, and land use. By contrast, the AF + energy system yields lower impacts in the other 11 out of 19 Environmental Footprint impact categories. Only AF + fodder offers greenhouse gas reduction compared to petroleum diesel (−25%). Our SLCA results indicate that AF + fodder yields lower impacts in the following categories: fair salaries, forced labor, gender wage gap, health expenditure, unemployment, and violation of employment laws and regulations. AF + energy performs favorably in the other three out of nine social indicators. We conclude that the choice of co-products has a strong influence on the sustainability of algal fuel production. Despite this, none of the compared systems are found to yield a consistent advantage in the environmental or social dimension. It is, therefore, not possible to recommend a co-production strategy without weighing environmental and social issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (21) ISSN:1660-4601 ISSN:1661-7827 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |