Resource utilization of cytomegalovirus immune globulin in prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric heart transplantation

Autor: Jennifer Carapellucci, Katie Namtu, David M. Berman, Alfred Asante-Korang, Bethany L. Wisotzkey, Gabriella Blyumin, Diane Krasnopero, Amy L. Kiskaddon, Brian K. Brown
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Clinical transplantationREFERENCES. 33(12)
ISSN: 1399-0012
Popis: BACKGROUND There is debate whether cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin (CMV-Ig) is also needed for CMV prevention in heart transplant recipients in the era of good anti-viral drugs. METHODS We conducted a cost-savings quality initiative on CMV-Ig eventually leading to discontinuation of routine use of CMV-Ig for CMV prevention. Subsequently, a retrospective cohort study was conducted, comparing patients in cohort I (CMV-Ig plus anti-viral drugs, 2013-2015) to cohort II (anti-virals alone, 2015-2017). The medication acquisition costs and outcomes of CMV infection were assessed. RESULTS There were 39 total patients: 22/39(56%) in cohort I, with mean follow-up of 35.14 ± 17.38 months and 17/39(44%) in cohort II, mean follow-up of 19.12 ± 7.08 months. In cohort I, 5/22(22.7%) patients died from causes unrelated to CMV and 0/17 in cohort II died. There were 5/22(22.7%) patients in cohort I, and 2/17(9%) patients in cohort II that developed CMV infection (P = .508). Freedom from rejection was 81.8% (18/22) in cohort I, and 71% (12/17) in cohort II (P = .46), and 100% for allograft vasculopathy. There was significant reduction in medication acquisition cost following the protocol change of $260 839 or $15 343 per patient. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated an acquisition cost savings with similar clinical outcomes utilizing anti-viral CMV prophylaxis alone vs anti-viral prophylaxis plus CMV-Ig.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje