Health-related Quality of Life in the Phase III LUME-Colon 1 Study: Comparison and Interpretation of Results From EORTC QLQ-C30 Analyses
Autor: | Lenz, Heinz Joseph, Argilés Martínez, Guillem, Yoshino, Takayuki, Lonardi, Sara, Falcone, Alfredo, Limón, María Luisa, Sobrero, Alberto, Hastedt, Claudia, Peil, Barbara, Voss, Florian, Griebsch, Ingolf, Van Cutsem, Eric, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Institut Català de la Salut, [Lenz HJ] Division of Medical Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA. [Argiles G] Servei d'Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Yoshino T] Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan. [Lonardi S] Phase 1 Trial Unit and Medical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy. [Falcone A] Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. [Limón ML] Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Indoles
Colorectal cancer Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy [Other subheadings] chemistry.chemical_compound 0302 clinical medicine Environmental Health::Science::Environmental Quality::Quality of Life [PUBLIC HEALTH] Quality of life Sickness Impact Profile Surveys and Questionnaires Còlon - Càncer Medicine Eortc qlq c30 Gastroenterology Prognosis neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias del sistema digestivo::neoplasias gastrointestinales::neoplasias intestinales::neoplasias colorrectales [ENFERMEDADES] humanities Survival Rate Oncology Qualitat de vida HRQoL MMRM Nintedanib QoL Time to deterioration salud ambiental::ciencia::calidad ambiental::calidad de vida [SALUD PÚBLICA] 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Colonic Neoplasms 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology medicine.medical_specialty Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia [Otros calificadores] Antineoplastic Agents Placebo Article 03 medical and health sciences Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Digestive System Neoplasms::Gastrointestinal Neoplasms::Intestinal Neoplasms::Colorectal Neoplasms [DISEASES] Internal medicine Humans Social functioning Health related quality of life business.industry medicine.disease Confidence interval chemistry Quality of Life Medicaments - Administració business Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Scientia Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Clin Colorectal Cancer |
ISSN: | 1533-0028 |
Popis: | Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) outputs from the LUME-Colon 1 study, we compared and discussed different statistical methods for evaluating health-related quality of life data in oncology clinical trials. The different analyses consistently showed that patients' overall global health status/quality of life status was not impaired by active treatment with nintedanib versus placebo, and that patients perceived some benefits with nintedanib compared with placebo. INTRODUCTION: We used European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) data from the LUME-Colon 1 study to illustrate different methods of statistical analysis for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and compared the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nintedanib 200 mg twice daily plus best supportive care (n = 386) or matched placebo plus best supportive care (n = 382). Five methods (mean treatment difference averaged over time, using a mixed-effects growth curve model; mixed-effects models for repeated measurements (MMRM); time-to-deterioration (TTD); status change; and responder analysis) were used to analyze EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL and scores from functional scales. RESULTS: Overall, GHS/QoL and physical functioning deteriorated over time. Mean treatment difference slightly favored nintedanib over placebo for physical functioning (adjusted mean, 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–4.34) and social functioning (adjusted mean, 2.62; 95% CI, 0.66–4.47). GHS/QoL was numerically better with nintedanib versus placebo (adjusted mean, 1.61; 95% CI, −0.004 to 3.27). MMRM analysis had similar results, with better physical functioning in the nintedanib group at all timepoints. There was no significant delay in GHS/QoL deterioration (10%) and physical functioning (16%) with nintedanib versus placebo (TTD analysis). Status change analysis showed a higher proportion of patients with markedly improved GHS/QoL and physical functioning in the nintedanib versus placebo groups. Responder analysis showed a similar, less pronounced pattern. CONCLUSION: Analyses of EORTC QLQ-C30 data showed that HRQoL was not impaired by treatment with nintedanib versus placebo. Analysis and interpretation of HRQoL endpoints should consider symptom type and severity and course of disease. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |