Number Needed to Benefit From Information (NNBI): Proposal From a Mixed Methods Research Study With Practicing Family Physicians
| Autor: | Bernard Marlow, Vera Granikov, Michael Shulha, Ivan Luiz Marques Ricarte, Pierre Pluye, Janique Johnson-Lafleur, Roland Grad |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Information management Canada medicine.medical_specialty media_common.quotation_subject Alternative medicine Information Storage and Retrieval Qualitative property Health Information Management Surveys and Questionnaires Perception Outcome Assessment Health Care medicine Humans Longitudinal Studies Qualitative Research Aged media_common business.industry Multimethodology Methodology Middle Aged Vignette Family medicine Number needed to treat Female Family Practice business Numbers Needed To Treat Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | The Annals of Family Medicine. 11:559-567 |
| ISSN: | 1544-1717 1544-1709 |
| Popis: | PURPOSE We wanted to describe family physicians’ use of information from an electronic knowledge resource for answering clinical questions, and their perception of subsequent patient health outcomes; and to estimate the number needed to benefit from information (NNBI), defined as the number of patients for whom clinical information was retrieved for 1 to benefit. METHODS We undertook a mixed methods research study, combining quantitative longitudinal and qualitative research studies. Participants were 41 family physicians from primary care clinics across Canada. Physicians were given access to 1 electronic knowledge resource on handheld computer in 2008–2009. For the outcome assessment, participants rated their searches using a validated method. Rated searches were examined during interviews guided by log reports that included ratings. Cases were defined as clearly described searches where clinical information was used for a specific patient. For each case, interviewees described information-related patient health outcomes. For the mixed methods data analysis, quantitative and qualitative data were merged into clinical vignettes (each vignette describing a case). We then estimated the NNBI. RESULTS In 715 of 1,193 searches for information conducted during an average of 86 days, the search objective was directly linked to a patient. Of those searches, 188 were considered to be cases. In 53 cases, participants associated the use of information with at least 1 patient health benefit. This finding suggested an NNBI of 14 (715/53). CONCLUSION The NNBI may be used in further experimental research to compare electronic knowledge resources. A low NNBI can encourage clinicians to search for information more frequently. If all searches had benefits, the NNBI would be 1. In addition to patient benefits, learning and knowledge reinforcement outcomes are frequently reported. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|