Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF

Autor: Georg Griesinger, Elke Kahler, Herman Tournaye, Bharati Dhorepatil, Christophe Blockeel, Zi-Jiang Chen, Claire Pexman-Fieth, Ameet Patki, Gennady T. Sukhikh, D. Yang
Přispěvatelé: Surgical clinical sciences, Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine - Gynaecology, Biology of the Testis
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey306
Popis: STUDY QUESTION: Is oral dydrogesterone 30 mg daily non-inferior to 8% micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) gel 90 mg daily for luteal phase support in IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Oral dydrogesterone demonstrated non-inferiority to MVP gel for the presence of fetal heartbeats at 12 weeks of gestation (non-inferiority margin 10%). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The standard of care for luteal phase support in IVF is the use of MVP; however, it is associated with vaginal irritation, discharge and poor patient compliance. Oral dydrogesterone may replace MVP as the standard of care if it is found to be efficacious with an acceptable safety profile. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Lotus II was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase III, non-inferiority study conducted at 37 IVF centers in 10 countries worldwide, from August 2015 until May 2017. In total, 1034 premenopausal women (>18 to
Databáze: OpenAIRE