Winnertziini Panelius 1965

Autor: Fedotova, Zoya A., Perkovsky, Evgeny E., Ross, Andrew J., Zhang, Qingqing
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
ISSN: 0031-0301
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6317845
Popis: At the present time, there is no agreed single system for all taxonomic groups of gall midges. Individual changes made to the existing systems of subfamilies using different methods are not consistent with other taxa at the suprageneric rank. Here we follow the generally accepted system of gall midges (Gagn��, 1989; Skuhrav��, 1997; Tast��s-Duque, 2000) with additions as previously published (Fedotova, 2000; Fedotova & Perkovsky, 2009, 2016 a, 2017). Other classifications of gall midges (Sikora et al., 2019; Dorchin et al., 2019; Gagn�� & Jaschhof, 2021) contain many comparable inconsistencies. Recently, the phylogeny and taxonomy of the Cecidomyiidae was summarized by Sikora et al. (2019), taking into account data obtained by molecular methods (��evč��k et al., 2016) to determine the place of the family in the phylogeny of the infraorder Bibionomorpha. Most of the subfamilies and tribes were hypothesized to be monophyletic groups (Sikora et al., 2019) and these were included in a ���Catalog of the Cecidomyiidae of the World��� (Gagn�� & Jasсhhof, 2021). However, proposed system of Sikora et al. (2019) does not take into account the characters by which the subfamilies of archaic mycetophagous Porricondylinae and evolutionarily advanced phytophagous Cecidomyiinae were previously distinguished. The tribes of the subfamily Porricondylinae (Winnertziini, Porricondylini) were raised to subfamilies, in line with the largest and most diverse subfamily Cecidomyiinae. The weight of characters of the subfamilies Winnertziinae and Porricondylinae turned out to be significantly overestimated in comparison with the equivalent taxa of the supertribes of the subfamily Cecidomyiinae.At the same time, the rank of the supertribe is not used in the new classification of Gagn�� & Jaschhof (2021), and it is more likely that Porricondylinae and Winnertziinae could occupy this place. All Porricondylinae s. l. differ from Cecidomyiinae and Lasiopterinae by not fused 1 st and 2 nd flagellomeres, by the presence of a short apical appendage on the 1 st tarsal segment, by the presence of a characteristic fork at the base of the R5 vein, by well-defined veins Rs and rm+m, often S-shaped. Sometimes the venation is greatly reduced. Gonocoxites are fused. The ovipositor consists of 2 dorsal and 2 ventral plates; the dorsal plates are usually 2���3-segmented, rarely 1-segmented. Sclerotized spermathecae in the female may be well defined. VIII abdominal segment of larva with 4 dorsal papillae located between spiracles. On the first 7 abdominal segments of the body, in addition to the anterior ventral papillae, 2 posterior ventral papillae are developed. Recently, the subfamily Cecidomyiinae was also revised based on molecular genetic data (Dorchin et al., 2019). In this case, the rank of the tribe turned out to be underestimated. We consider the family Cecidomyiidae sensu lato comprise the subfamilies Porricondylinae s.l., Lasiopterinae and Cecidomyiinae, and the rank of the currently distinguished tribes corresponds to the supertribes. Two last subfamilies include supertribes: Lasiopteridi, Lopesiidi, Asphondyliidi, Mycodiplosidi, Aphidoletidi, Lestodiplosidi, Clinodiplosidi, Cecidomyiidi, Contariniidi (Fedotova, 2000, 2014; Perkovsky & Fedotova, 2016 and other articles by authors on the taxonomy of gall midges). In all systems, the rank of the ancestral supertribes Brachineuridi and Stomatosematidi has not changed. An improved dendrogram of gall midges was proposed based on the analysis of morphological characters of adults, pupae, and larvae (Plakidas, 2017, 2018, 2019). The independence of the families Lestremiidae and Cecidomyiidae, united in the superfamily Cecidomyioidea, was confirmed. The raising in rank of the tribe Diallictiini (previously a subtribe), belonging now to the subfamily Porricondylinae was also justified (Plakidas, 2019). Earlier, the phylogenetic relationships between nine subfamilies Cecidomyiidae s.l. were established on the basis of a cladistic analysis of the generic characters of larvae, pupae, and adults (Tast��s-Duque, 2000). These are all now considered tribes s.str. in Porricondylinae s.l. Among them, the higher gall midges are represented by the subfamily Cecidomyiinae. According to the world catalog (Gagn�� & Jaschhof, 2021), the Porricondylinae s.l. is absent. It is divided into 2 subfamilies: Porricondylinae s.str. (with tribes Porricondylini and Asynaptini) + Winnertziinae s.str. (with tribes Heteropezini and Diallactiini) comprises 885 (282 + 603) species, including 88 fossil species (56 + 32) (10%), whereas the Cecidomyiinae s.l. ���comprises 5,004 species, of which only 38 are based on fossils (0.8%). The cosmopolitan tribe Winnertziini s.str. includes nine genera and 180 species(Gagn�� &Jaschhof, 2021; Nel, 2021).Fossil forms(five genera,14species)are represented by Cretowinnertzia angustula Gagn��, 1977 from Upper Cretaceous Canadian amber; Libanoclinorrhytis jaschhofi Azar & Nel, 2020 and Libanohilversidia doryi Azar & Nel, 2020 from Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber; 3 species of the genus Winnertzia from late Eocene Baltic amber (W. affinis Meunier, 1904, W. cylindrica Meunier, 1904, W. radiata Meunier, 1904); one species from Lowermost Eocene Oise amber (Electroxylomyia eocenica Nel & Prokop, 2006; Rhipidoxylomyia rasnitsyni Nel, 2021) and 6 species in 2 genera from late Eocene Rovno amber (W. bellata Fedotova, 2005, W. isotoma Fedotova, 2005, W. recusata Fedotova & Perkovsky, 2008, W. kapustini Fedotova & Perkovsky, 2008, W. separata Meunier 1904 and Rhipidoxylomyia vaga Fedotova & Perkovsky, 2008) (Meunier, 1904; Evenhuis, 1994; Fedotova & Perkovsky, 2005, 2008; Azar & Nel, 2020; Jaschhof, 2021; Nel, 2021). Some of these genera and species need additional study to confirm if they belong to the Winnertziini. The new genus Fushuniola gen. nov. belongs to Winnertziini according following characters: short 2+10- segmented female antennae; flagellomeres with hairshaped sensoria; long thin ovipositor, curved dorsally; 3-segmented apical lobes of ovipositor and simple veins CuA and M3+4.
Published as part of Fedotova, Zoya A., Perkovsky, Evgeny E., Ross, Andrew J. & Zhang, Qingqing, 2022, A new genus and species of gall midges the tribe Winnertziini (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Porricondylinae) from lower Eocene Fushun amber from China, pp. 90-98 in Palaeoentomology 5 (1) on pages 92-94, DOI: 10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.1.11, http://zenodo.org/record/6280600
{"references":["Panelius, S. (1965) A revision of the European gall midges of the subfamily Porricondylinae (Diptera: Itonididae). Acta Zoologica Fennica, 113, 1 - 157.","Gagne, R. J. (1989) The plant-feeding gall midges of North America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, xi + 356 pp.","Skuhrava, M. (1997) Chapter 2.7. Family Cecidomyiidae. In: Papp, L. & Darvas, B. (Eds), Contribution to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera (with special reference to flies of economic importance): Nematocera and Lower Brachycera. Vol. 2, Science Herald, Budapest, pp. 71 - 204.","Tastas-Duque, R. (2000) Phylogenetic relationships within Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) as indicated by cladistic analyses. Paper V (manuscript). In: Ultrastructural and systematic studies of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). [PhD Thesis, Department of Zoology, Stockholm University], 1 - 23.","Fedotova, Z. A. (2000) [Phytophagous gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) of deserts and mountains of Kazakhstan: morphology, biology, distribution, phylogeny, and taxonomy.] Samara: SamVen, Samara State Agricultural Academy, 804 pp. [In Russian]","Fedotova, Z. A. & Perkovsky, E. E. (2009) New gall midges of the tribe Leptosynini (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) from the Late Eocene ambers and the classification of the supertribe Heteropezidi. Paleontological Journal, 43 (9), 1101 - 1179. https: // doi. org / 10.1134 / S 0031030109090111","Fedotova, Z. A. & Perkovsky, E. E. (2016 a) New gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyioidea) from Late Cretaceous amber of the Taimyr Peninsula. Paleontological Journal, 50 (9), 1001 - 1026. https: // doi. org / 10.1134 / S 0031030116090033","Grimaldi, D. A. & Ross, A. J. (2017) Extraordinary Lagerstatten in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of Burma. In: Fraser, N. C. & Sues H. - D. (Eds), Terrestrial conservation Lagerstatten: windows into the evolution of life on land. Dunedin Academic Press Ltd, Edinburgh, pp. 287 - 342.","Sikora, T., Jaschhof, M., Mantic, M., Kasprak, D. & Sevcik, J. (2019) Considerable congruence, enlightening conflict: molecular analysis largely supports morphology-based hypotheses on Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 185, 98 - 110. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / zoolinnean / zly 029","Dorchin, N., Harris, K. M. & Stireman, J. O., III (2019) Phylogeny of the gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Cecidomyiinae): systematics, evolution of feeding modes and diversification rates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 140, 1 - 15. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2019.106602","Gagne, R. J. & Jaschhof, M. (2021) A catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the world. 5 th Edition. Digital. 813 pp. https: // www. ars. usda. gov / ARSUserFiles / 80420580 / Gagne _","Sevcik, J., Kasprak, D., Mantic, M., Fitzgerald, S., Sevcikova, T., Tothova, A. & Jaschhof, M. (2016) Molecular phylogeny of the megadiverse insect infraorder Bibionomorpha sensu lato (Diptera). PeerJ, 4, e 2563, 1 - 30. https: // doi. org / 10.7717 / peerj. 2563","Fedotova, Z. A. (2014) Classification of the gall midge tribe Aphidoletini (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae: Aphidoletidi) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species from the Kurile Islands. Entomological Review, 94 (7), 1031 - 1051. https: // doi. org / 10.1134 / S 0013873814070124","Perkovsky, E. E. & Fedotova, Z. A. (2016) Rovnodiplosis eduardi gen. et sp. nov., the first record of a fossil gall midge of the supertribe Mycodiplosidi (Diptera, Cecidomyioidea, Cecidomyiidae) in the late Eocene of the Rovno amber. Paleontological Journal, 50 (9), 1027 - 1032. https: // doi. org / 10.1134 / S 0031030116090124","Plakidas, J. D. (2017) The wood midges (Diptera: Lestremiidae) of Allegheny County Pennsylvania. Loyalfield Publishing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 127 pp.","Plakidas, J. D. (2018) Identification of the Porricondylinae and Winnertziinae larvae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae sensu stricto). Loyalfield Publishing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 4 color pls., 88 pp.","Plakidas, J. D. (2019) New species and new distribution records of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) from Allegheny County Pennsylvania. Loyalfield Publishing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 89 pp.","Nel, A. (2021) New Cecidomyiidae from the Lowermost Eocene French amber (Diptera). Palaeoentomology, 4 (6), 620 - 628. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / palaeoentomology. 4.6.11","Azar, D. & Nel, A. (2020) New Cecidomyiidae from the Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber (Diptera). Palaeoentomology, 3 (5), 525 - 540. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / palaeoentomology. 3.5.10","Meunier, F. (1904) Monographie des Cecidomyiidae, Sciaridae, Mycetophilidae et Chironomidae de l'ambre de la Baltique. Annales de la Societe Scientifique de Bruxelles, 28, pls. I - XVI, 12 - 275.","Nel, A. & Prokop, J. (2006) New fossil gall midges from the earliest Eocene French amber (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Geodiversitas, 28, 37 - 54.","Fedotova, Z. A. & Perkovsky, E. E. (2005) New gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) from the Rovno amber: subfamily Porricondylinae (tribes Bryocryptini and Winnertziini) and subfamily Lasiopterinae (tribes Brachineurini and Oligotrophini). Paleontological Journal, 39 (1), 41 - 51.","Fedotova, Z. A. & Perkovsky, E. E. (2008) New taxa of gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) from Dubrovitsa (Rovno amber). Vestnik Zoologii, 42 (1), 27 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 11492 - 008 - 2007 - 6","Evenhuis, N. L. (1994) Catalogue of the fossil flies of the world (Insecta: Diptera). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 600 pp."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: