Metastatic Risk Factors Associated with Class 1A Uveal Melanoma Patients
Autor: | Yong Qin, Maura S. Glover, Elizabeth Urias, Stephen K. Gruschkus, Michelle A. Williams, Sapna Pradyuman Patel, Alexej Ballhausen, Dan S. Gombos |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Oncology Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Article Metastasis 03 medical and health sciences Class 1A 0302 clinical medicine Internal medicine medicine Class 1a Uveal Melanoma metastasis risk factors Cumulative incidence Stage (cooking) RC254-282 Proportional hazards model business.industry Melanoma Cancer Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens medicine.disease GEP Confidence interval 030104 developmental biology 030221 ophthalmology & optometry uveal melanoma business |
Zdroj: | Cancers Volume 13 Issue 13 Cancers, Vol 13, Iss 3292, p 3292 (2021) |
ISSN: | 2072-6694 |
DOI: | 10.3390/cancers13133292 |
Popis: | In uveal melanoma (UM), gene expression profiling (GEP) is commonly used to classify metastatic risk into three groups (Class 1A, 1B, and 2). Class 1A patients have a lower metastatic risk of 2% at 5 years compared to other groups. We aimed to describe clinical features associated with the development of metastasis in this low-risk group. This single-center IRB-approved retrospective case series review included all UM patients between February 2006 and March 2019 with an archived or fresh specimen classified as Class 1A. Cox regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to identify factors associated with metastasis development and OS. Among 73 UM patients with Class 1A, the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis was 4.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Stage III disease (HR 20.7 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4–300.6 p = 0.0264) was found to be independently associated with metastatic recurrence, while primary therapy was associated with OS (enucleation vs. brachytherapy, HR 13.5 95% CI 1.3–147.6 p = 0.0348). Combined clinical decision-making utilizing factors such as GEP class, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and COMS size could have a significant clinical impact by improving risk stratification and adapting follow-up intervals in UM Class 1A patients. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |