Description of a Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in a Large Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia
Autor: | Henry Baffoe-Bonnie, Abdullah M. Assiri, Ra’ed Hijazi, Hanan H. Balkhy, Abdulaziz Bin Saeed, Aiman El-Saed, Sameera M. Al Johani, Majid Alshamrani, Thamer H. Alenazi, Hail M. Al-Abdely, Yaseen M. Arabi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Microbiology (medical) Adult Male Pediatrics medicine.medical_specialty Infectious Disease Transmission Patient-to-Professional Epidemiology Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Health Personnel 030106 microbiology Saudi Arabia Comorbidity medicine.disease_cause law.invention Disease Outbreaks Tertiary Care Centers 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine law medicine Infection control Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Prospective Studies Aged Nasal Septum Aged 80 and over Cross Infection Infection Control business.industry Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Outbreak Emergency department Original Articles Middle Aged medicine.disease Intensive care unit Respiration Artificial Infectious Diseases Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Middle East respiratory syndrome Female business Coronavirus Infections Contact tracing |
Zdroj: | Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology |
ISSN: | 1559-6834 0899-823X |
Popis: | BACKGROUNDSince the first isolation of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Saudi Arabia in 2012, sporadic cases, clusters, and sometimes large outbreaks have been reported.OBJECTIVETo describe the recent (2015) MERS-CoV outbreak at a large tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.METHODSWe conducted an epidemiologic outbreak investigation, including case finding and contact tracing and screening. MERS-CoV cases were categorized as suspected, probable, and confirmed. A confirmed case was defined as positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test for MERS-CoV.RESULTSOf the 130 suspected cases, 81 (62%) were confirmed and 49 (38%) were probable. These included 87 patients (67%) and 43 healthcare workers (33%). Older age (mean [SD], 64.4 [18.3] vs 40.1 [11.3] years, P<.001), symptoms (97% vs 58%, P<.001), and comorbidity (99% vs 42%, P<.001) were more common in patients than healthcare workers. Almost all patients (97%) were hospitalized whereas most healthcare workers (72%) were home isolated. Among 96 hospitalized cases, 63 (66%) required intensive care unit management and 60 (63%) required mechanical ventilation. Among all 130 cases, 51 (39%) died; all were patients (51 [59%]) with no deaths among healthcare workers. More than half (54%) of infections were believed to be caught at the emergency department. Strict infection control measures, including isolation and closure of the emergency department, were implemented to interrupt the chain of transmission and end the outbreak.CONCLUSIONMERS-CoV remains a major healthcare threat. Early recognition of cases and rapid implementation of infection control measures are necessary.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1–9 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |