Long‐term effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on team climate: A mixed‐method evaluation study
| Autor: | Mirelle Hanskamp-Sebregts, Thijs Merkx, Jeroen W J H J Meijerink, Anita J Heideveld-Chevalking, Meilin Schaap |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Therapy Area: Other
education MEDLINE 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Tertiary care Feedback Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] Tumours of the digestive tract Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 14] 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Nursing Intervention (counseling) Humans Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Netherlands Patient Care Team Original Paper Surgical team Team climate business.industry Debriefing General Medicine Perioperative Original Papers Method evaluation business Rare cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 9] |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75 International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75, 3 International Journal of Clinical Practice |
| ISSN: | 1742-1241 1368-5031 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ijcp.13689 |
| Popis: | Contains fulltext : 235099.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the long-term (5 years) effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on team climate. We explored the barriers and facilitators of the performance of perioperative briefing and debriefing to explain its effects on team climate and to make recommendations for further improvement of surgical safety tools. METHODS: A mixed-method evaluation study was carried out amongst surgical staff at a tertiary care university hospital with 593-bed capacity in the Netherlands. Thirteen surgical teams were included. Team climate inventory and a standardised evaluation questionnaire were used to measure team climate (primary outcome) and experiences with perioperative briefing and debriefing (secondary outcome), respectively. Thirteen surgical team members participated in a semi-structured interview to explore barriers and facilitators of the performance of perioperative briefing and debriefing. RESULTS: The dimension "participative safety" increased significantly 5 years after the implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing (P = .02 (95% confidence interval 1.18-9.25)). Perioperative briefing and debriefing were considered a useful method for improving and sustaining participative safety and cooperation within surgical teams. The positive aspects of briefing were that shared agreements made at the start of the day and that briefing enabled participants to work as a team. Participants were less satisfied regarding debriefing, mostly because of the lack of a sense of urgency and a lack of a safe culture for feedback. Briefing and debriefing had less influence on efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Although perioperative briefing and debriefing improve participative safety, the intervention will become more effective for maintaining team climate when teams are complete, irrelevant questions are substituted by customised ones and when there is a safer culture for feedback. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|